-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SurvNet Adaptations - Create new field “Suspicious case” to cases [2] #3419
Comments
IfSG relevant: § 11 (1) 1 c: Indication when a suspicion has not been confirmed Data are transmitted to RKI |
I would actually like to refine this issue so it makes more sense in Sormas. Only show this checkbox if 'suspect case' is selected as the case classification. Only when 'suspicion not confirmed' is checked, show the date field and the two further check boxes. Also change the classification to 'no case' as already mentioned above. |
Why do we need this checkbox in the first place? Shouldn't setting the case classification to "Not a case" be enough? This will also update the date of classification, so we'd basically only need the two additional checkboxes for German systems. |
@MateStrysewske I'd like that solution because it's minimalistic. We could also then only show the two additional checkboxes when 'no case' is selected and use 'suspicion not confirmed' as a heading for the two. |
@kwa20 I think we need to first investigate what is the epidemiological definition of suspicious case in term of RKI. In some countries, suspicious case == suspected case. |
@bernardsilenou I didn't write anything like that. I don't think we need a new classification for this. |
After discussing with @bernardsilenou and considering @MateStrysewske's comment, we suggest this solution: We map 'no case' to 'suspicion not confirmed' and use the date of classification for mapping to the date field in SurvNet. When a user sets the case classification to 'no case', the drop down field 'reason for this classification' should appear. There you can select the variables shown in the mock-up ('information provided by physician' and 'verification of different pathogen' are mapped to SurvNet). If other is selected, a free text field appears to specify the reason further. Since multiple options can be chosen in SurvNet, we would need to be able to do it in Sormas too. We thought that if we have checkboxes, it could get messy when more variables are added later on. Would something as displayed in the mock-up even be possible? We also suggest to make this field available for everyone, not just the german servers since everyone can benefit from this. Generally, we are not quite happy with 'verification of different pathogen' because that doesn't necessarily mean, that the person can not be a case in regards to that disease, but we could not think of another way to properly map it to SurvNet. |
@kwa20 We don't have such a component right now and I don't know whether it makes sense to build one for the Vaadin application. Because of that, my current feeling is that we should probably go with checkboxes for now and do it in a more user-friendly way when using the new technology. |
@MateStrysewske Ok, let's use checkboxes with the option of multiple entries then with the heading "Reason for this classification". We then have a free text field when other is selected. @bernardsilenou We should probably not give too many options for selecting the reason for now then, because it will get messy with very many checkboxes. |
For the captions, see screenshot above |
…o-cases-2 #3419 - Create new field “Suspicious case” to cases
App is broken because the database upgrade script is faulty. Please repair this as soon as possible. |
…eReasonDetails #3419 Create new field “Suspicious case” to cases - fixing missing co…
Fixed missing column in android app. |
Validated ticket on the latest version of Sormas version 1.57.0-snapshot |
Imports doesn't work as expected when the newly added check boxes are marked with Yes. |
@raghupola-vg - please provide more details about how to reproduce import issue. |
@cazacmarin Yes, pls. also add it to import functionality |
Another case linked to Import was opened (as the import is working generically and is not a part of the development of this CR. Export is working as expected + all other conditions). |
…ar only in case if 1 export does exist.
Situation Description
Feature Description
Create new field “Suspicious case” to cases
Case > case information
New field (DE only) –
“Verdachtsfall (de – de) | “Suspicious case” (en) [SurvNet field names: SuspicionNotConf; SuspicionNotDat; SuspicionNotPhysician; SuspicionNotPathOther]
If the answer is “suspicion not confirmed” then change case classification to “no case”.
Data Type: check box, date
Values (de-de) | (en)
Verdacht nicht bestätigt am | suspicous not confirmed
o Information durch Arzt/Ärztin| information provided by physician
o Nachweis eines anderen Erregers| detection of other pathogen
Data Type: Datum |date
Possible Alternatives
Additional Information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: