Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Full sudo refresh is scheduled even if there is no sudo responder #2500

Closed
sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Full sudo refresh is scheduled even if there is no sudo responder #2500

sssd-bot opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed.

Comments

@sssd-bot
Copy link

sssd-bot commented May 2, 2020

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/1458

  • Created at 2012-08-06 17:42:23 by jhrozek
  • Closed as Fixed
  • Assigned to pbrezina

The "full" sudo refresh is currently always scheduled on back end startup, even though there is no sudo responder configured. This triggers an LDAP connection and a search right after the back end starts.

We should only schedule the refresh when we need it. One possible way might be on receiving sudo responder registration in client_registration().

Comments


Comment from pbrezina at 2012-08-07 11:18:26

If you want to disable specific module you can always set it to none in sssd.conf (sudo_provider = none). But if you insist on doing it in the code directly I would suggest that we initialize only those backend modules that have appropriate responder configured. Instead of initializing them in be_process_init() we would do it during client_registration().


Comment from dpal at 2012-08-09 16:01:44

Fields changed

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.9.0 RC2
rhbz: => 0


Comment from pbrezina at 2012-08-23 12:56:40

Fields changed

owner: somebody => pbrezina
proposed_priority: => Undefined
status: new => assigned


Comment from pbrezina at 2012-09-05 15:06:11

Fields changed

patch: 0 => 1
resolution: => fixed
status: assigned => closed


Comment from pbrezina at 2012-09-05 16:43:32

I have closed it by accident. The patch is on the list.

resolution: fixed =>
status: closed => reopened


Comment from jhrozek at 2012-09-12 14:28:57

master: 30f029e

resolution: => fixed
status: reopened => closed


Comment from jhrozek at 2017-02-24 14:53:04

Metadata Update from @jhrozek:

  • Issue assigned to pbrezina
  • Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.9.0 RC1
@sssd-bot sssd-bot added the Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed. label May 2, 2020
@sssd-bot sssd-bot closed this as completed May 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Fixed Issue was closed as fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants