-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fatal errors in log during Anaconda installation: "CRIT sss_cache:No domains configured, fatal error!" #6387
Labels
Comments
pbrezina
added a commit
to pbrezina/sssd
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2022
This syslog message would also appear when calling other tools like sss_cache which is confusing. We return specific error code instead and let the error be syslogged in the monitor in monitor.c:main (this is already implemented). Resolves: SSSD#6387
This is a regression introduced in #6182 |
pbrezina
added a commit
to pbrezina/sssd
that referenced
this issue
Oct 12, 2022
…ains We print the error as fatal error in the monitor to make sure the message is correctly visible. However, the error is not fatal for tools like sss_cache and it should not be printed there by default. Since the tools have default debug level set to SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, it is sufficient to just drop the level to critical. Resolves: SSSD#6387
pbrezina
added a commit
to pbrezina/sssd
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2022
This syslog message would also appear when calling other tools like sss_cache which is confusing. We return specific error code instead and let the error be syslogged in the monitor in monitor.c:main (this is already implemented). Resolves: SSSD#6387 :fixes: A regression when running sss_cache when no SSSD domain is enabled would produce a syslog critical message was fixed.
pbrezina
added a commit
to pbrezina/sssd
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2022
…ains We print the error as fatal error in the monitor to make sure the message is correctly visible. However, the error is not fatal for tools like sss_cache and it should not be printed there by default. Since the tools have default debug level set to SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, it is sufficient to just drop the level to critical. Resolves: SSSD#6387
pbrezina
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2022
…ains We print the error as fatal error in the monitor to make sure the message is correctly visible. However, the error is not fatal for tools like sss_cache and it should not be printed there by default. Since the tools have default debug level set to SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, it is sufficient to just drop the level to critical. Resolves: #6387 Reviewed-by: Alejandro López <allopez@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sumit Bose <sbose@redhat.com>
pbrezina
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2022
This syslog message would also appear when calling other tools like sss_cache which is confusing. We return specific error code instead and let the error be syslogged in the monitor in monitor.c:main (this is already implemented). Resolves: #6387 :fixes: A regression when running sss_cache when no SSSD domain is enabled would produce a syslog critical message was fixed. Reviewed-by: Alejandro López <allopez@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sumit Bose <sbose@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit b38fdc8)
pbrezina
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2022
…ains We print the error as fatal error in the monitor to make sure the message is correctly visible. However, the error is not fatal for tools like sss_cache and it should not be printed there by default. Since the tools have default debug level set to SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, it is sufficient to just drop the level to critical. Resolves: #6387 Reviewed-by: Alejandro López <allopez@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sumit Bose <sbose@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit df55b1f)
Pushed PR: #6388
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133437
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: