-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SURF Design System: redesign SBS header #466
Comments
Use the header with metadata-list, which is now available in the SDS: https://design.surf.nl/#object-header |
Specifieke gevallen oplossen. |
Org
CO for admins
CO for members
Service
|
@FlorisFokkinga Is this story ready? Or do we need to resolve the matter of not-enough-space? |
We'll have to make a few decisions about what to show and how to show it. |
I think we can put multple (more or less similar) links in a cell, and also list an array of values for an attribute in a cell. Lets's limit this to 4 lines per cell, for example:
And if more values,
I suppose for email addresses, the 'two more values' should be a mailto-link. |
One minor adjustment to the mockup Floris made: the vertical lines should not be longer than the actual content. So in the mockup above, the first 2 vertical grey lines should be shorter. |
|
@oharsta, the new service about tab needs some padding to the left of its contents. |
I'm not really happy with it and would like to ask the UX-expert to propose a new design. If that is going to take a while I'm OK with releasing it like this, but would really prefer to have a new/better design. |
@FlorisFokkinga Assigned this to you for follow-up (or not). |
We're releasing the current design in v22. Followup in #623 |
Note: with header, I mean everything from the top of the page until the tables where the organisations/COs/members are listed, including the table header itself (the tabs).
Regarding the orange part of the header:
Regarding the object-header part (the gray area of the header):
Note1: likely, the object-header part will need some discussion, as probably not all properties will fit straight away.
Note2: possibly, we would like to get rid of the 2nd chevron menu, as it is not an existing element in the SDS. We should discuss that too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: