Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollback decorators #141

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 20, 2015
Merged

Rollback decorators #141

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 20, 2015

Conversation

bkutil
Copy link
Contributor

@bkutil bkutil commented Apr 14, 2015

As we found out the real root cause for the performance issues, I'd like to roll back the decorators code, rather than continuing the conversion to decorators across the whole code base.

If it is OK with you, please let me know if I should squash the reverting commits into a single one.

cc: @hennevogel @kirushik

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 79.01% when pulling bac1165 on bkutil:rollback_decorators into 77015ee on SUSE:master.

@kirushik
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.
Let me deploy this one and #142 in a moment

kirushik added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2015
@kirushik kirushik merged commit 237ae4f into SUSE:master Apr 20, 2015
@kirushik
Copy link
Contributor

Deployed to master.

@bkutil bkutil deleted the rollback_decorators branch April 20, 2015 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants