New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hidden types in (is)/2 while computing with rational numbers #538
Comments
Same as your message on discourse https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/future-of-support-for-rational-numbers/1779/6 |
This issue has been mentioned on SWI-Prolog. There might be relevant details there: https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/future-of-support-for-rational-numbers/1779/10 |
I now see what you mean. This indeed is a bug. I'll re-open it for the record, but I think it is a better idea to property support rationals than fixing this. And no, screen shots have no added value, so please stop using them. |
This issue has been mentioned on SWI-Prolog. There might be relevant details there: https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/using-screen-shots-and-images/1783/2 |
The (^)/2 operator is also affected:
|
There is some hidden types somewhere. Possibly rdiv(A,1) is displayed as A. Or somewhere inbetween converted to A. I get this “error”. First it tells me the sub result is 3.
Now I use the sub result to get the final result:
If I do it in one go I get the following result:
Thats a little strange.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: