Return new transformer when calling fit
#90
Assignees
Labels
Comments
lars-reimann
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2023
Closes #61. Closes #90. ### Summary of Changes * Common superclasses `TableTransformer` and `InvertibleTableTransformer` * Common interface for `fit`, `transform`, `fit_transform`, `inverse_transform` * Return new transformer when calling `fit` * More thorough tests --------- Co-authored-by: lars-reimann <lars-reimann@users.noreply.github.com>
lars-reimann
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2023
## [0.7.0](v0.6.0...v0.7.0) (2023-03-29) ### Features * `sort_rows` of a `Table` ([#104](#104)) ([20aaf5e](20aaf5e)), closes [#14](#14) * add `_file` suffix to methods interacting with files ([#103](#103)) ([ec011e4](ec011e4)) * improve transformers for tabular data ([#108](#108)) ([b18a06d](b18a06d)), closes [#61](#61) [#90](#90) * remove `OrdinalEncoder` ([#107](#107)) ([b92bba5](b92bba5)), closes [#61](#61) * specify features and target when creating a `TaggedTable` ([#114](#114)) ([95e1fc7](95e1fc7)), closes [#27](#27) * swap `name` and `data` parameters of `Column` ([#105](#105)) ([c2f8da5](c2f8da5))
|
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.7.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Methods of data containers like Table always return a new data container. The
fitmethod of transformers (safeds.data.tabular.transformation), however, mutates the transformer in place.Desired solution
fitshould return a new transformer.fit_transformshould maybe return the fitted transformer and the transformed table.Possible alternatives (optional)
No response
Screenshots (optional)
No response
Additional Context (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: