fix: blinking issue on homepage #259
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
github-actions
bot
added
wait for reviewers
SWOC S4
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job, @Sanchitbajaj02! 🎉 Thank you for submitting your pull request. Your contribution is valuable and we appreciate your efforts to improve our project. Keep being the part of the community!
'We will promptly review your changes and offer feedback. Keep up the excellent work!
Kindly remember to check our Contributing Guidelines'
WalkthroughThe updates involve enhancing security and usability in the privacy policy links, refining the content on the terms and conditions page for better clarity, and addressing a bug related to infinite user verification calls by adjusting the dependencies in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by:!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/app/(support)/privacy/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/app/(support)/terms/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/core/navbar/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
src/app/(support)/terms/page.tsx (1)
- 178-306: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [23-303]
The rephrasing and restructuring of the content on the
Termspage aim to improve clarity and readability, which is crucial for ensuring that users understand the terms and conditions they're agreeing to. It's important to review these changes with a legal perspective to ensure that the rephrased content remains accurate and does not inadvertently alter the meaning of any terms. If the changes have been vetted for legal accuracy and maintain the original intent of the terms, this update is a positive step towards making the terms more accessible to users.src/app/(support)/privacy/page.tsx (2)
- 26-30: The addition of
target="_blank"andrel="noopener noreferrer"to the anchor tag is a good practice for opening external links. This ensures that the new page opens in a new tab and mitigates potential security risks associated withtarget="_blank".- 212-216: Similar to the previous comment, adding
target="_blank"andrel="noopener noreferrer"to this anchor tag is a good security practice for external links. It's great to see consistency in applying these attributes across the Privacy Policy page.
| <a | ||
| href="mailto:sanchit02@outlook.com" | ||
| className="hover:text-primary-light" | ||
| rel="noopener noreferrer" | ||
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While the rel="noopener noreferrer" attribute is correctly applied here for security reasons, the target="_blank" attribute is missing. If the intention is to open the email client in a new tab or window, adding target="_blank" would be consistent with the approach taken for other external links in this document. However, it's worth noting that mailto: links typically open an email client directly and may not require target="_blank" in the same way a hyperlink to a webpage would.
- <a href="mailto:sanchit02@outlook.com" className="hover:text-primary-light" rel="noopener noreferrer">
+ <a href="mailto:sanchit02@outlook.com" className="hover:text-primary-light" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Note: Consider if opening the email client in a new tab/window is the desired behavior, as it may not be necessary or expected for mailto: links.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| <a | |
| href="mailto:sanchit02@outlook.com" | |
| className="hover:text-primary-light" | |
| rel="noopener noreferrer" | |
| > | |
| <a | |
| href="mailto:sanchit02@outlook.com" | |
| className="hover:text-primary-light" | |
| rel="noopener noreferrer" | |
| target="_blank" | |
| > |
| @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ const Navbar = ({ starCount }: { starCount?: number }) => { | |||
| clearTimeout(timeoutId); | |||
| console.log("clear"); | |||
| }; | |||
| }, [userIdFromCookies, dispatch]); | |||
| }, []); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removing userIdFromCookies and dispatch from the dependency array of the useEffect hook will indeed prevent the infinite loop issue by ensuring the effect only runs once after the component mounts. However, this change means that updates to userIdFromCookies or actions dispatched will no longer trigger this effect. If the logic inside this useEffect is intended to run only once during the component's lifecycle, this change is appropriate. Otherwise, consider if there's a need to respond to changes in userIdFromCookies or dispatched actions, and if so, explore alternative solutions to prevent the infinite loop while still responding to relevant changes.
Sanchitbajaj02
added
🪲 bug
github-actions
bot
added
wait for reviewers
SWOC S4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/backend/posts.api.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/core/navbar/index.tsx (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/core/navbar/index.tsx
Additional comments: 1
src/backend/posts.api.ts (1)
- 36-38: The addition of a pre-check for
palettegramDBandpostsCollectionbefore attempting to fetch posts is a good practice. It ensures that the function fails early with a clear error message if the necessary configuration is not provided, improving the robustness of the code.
| const posts = await db.listDocuments(palettegramDB, postsCollection); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!posts) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The check if (!posts) after attempting to fetch documents from the database is a bit misleading. Depending on the database and its SDK, an empty result set might not necessarily be null or undefined but could be an empty array. It's important to clarify what the expected result is in case of no documents found and handle that scenario appropriately.
Consider verifying the expected behavior when no documents are found and adjust the error handling accordingly. For example, if an empty array is a valid response, this check might be unnecessary or misleading.
| throw new Error("Error fetching data"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return tweets; | ||
| return posts; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Returning the posts directly is straightforward and aligns with the function's purpose. However, it's important to ensure that the error handling mechanism is consistent across the application. Currently, if an error occurs, it's logged to the console but not communicated back to the caller. This might lead to silent failures in the application where the caller expects a response but receives undefined instead.
Consider either throwing the error or returning a consistent error response to the caller to handle it appropriately.
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * @description get all posts present in the database | ||
| * @returns {Object} posts db | ||
| * @returns posts | ||
| */ | ||
| const getAllPosts = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const tweets = await db.listDocuments(palettegramDB, postsCollection); | ||
| if (!tweets) { | ||
| if (!palettegramDB || !postsCollection) { | ||
| throw new Error("Either databaseId or collectionId is not provided"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const posts = await db.listDocuments(palettegramDB, postsCollection); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!posts) { | ||
| throw new Error("Error fetching data"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return tweets; | ||
| return posts; | ||
| } catch (error: any) { | ||
| console.log(error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The import section includes several unused imports such as storage, ID, Query, usersCollection, bucketStorage, which could potentially lead to confusion and clutter in the code. It's a good practice to remove unused imports to keep the code clean and maintainable.
Consider removing any imports that are not used within this file to improve code clarity and reduce potential confusion.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The error handling in various functions logs the error to the console but does not rethrow it or handle it in a way that the calling function can react to. This approach might be suitable for logging purposes but could lead to issues in error propagation and handling at higher levels of the application.
Consider adopting a consistent error handling strategy across all functions. This could involve rethrowing the error with additional context, returning a specific error object, or using a global error handling mechanism to ensure that errors are not silently ignored.
Related Issue
fixes #258
Description
The issue is fixed by removing the dispatch method and cookie value from the useEffect's dependency array.
Screenshots