Skip to content

Evaluation of Distributed Ledger Technologies' Suitability for Personal Data Provenance

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Sashks/bachelor-thesis

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

38 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

2021-BA-Bachvarov

Evaluation of the suitability of popular blockchain designs (Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric) for personal data provenance in the domain of healthcare and finance

Collaboration between:

Institute for Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods (AIFB) - Critical Information Infrastructures (CII)

and

Institute of Information Security and Dependability (KASTEL) - Decentralized Systems and Network Services (DSN)

Meeting 24.01.22

  1. 2 Copys

  2. 3 Signed docs

  3. Put everything in git

  4. Presentation - second half of feb

Meeting 17.01.22

  1. Add more to abstr, disc, concl.

  2. Spellcheck

  3. Flowchart

Meeting 10.01.22

  1. Venn diagrams - maybe

  2. Finish 5.Discussion

  3. Labels and References

Meeting 20.12.21

  1. Abstract - Intro - Fundamentals - Similar Work - Method - Results - Discussion

  2. Etw. messen? - Nein

  3. Winterplan

Meeting 13.12.21

  1. Hermeneutics - more detailed description

  2. Search strings table

  3. Use cases differences

  4. Considered approaches table

Meeting 06.12.21

  1. Method

  2. Better Tables (relevant, more relevant, not relevant)

Meeting 22.11.21

  1. Tables in 3.1 not necessary

  2. TikZ !

    • tip - standalone package

  3. Leave only the really necessary requirements and characteristics

Meeting 15.11.21

  1. Explain how the groups were formed

  2. Use-Case-Tables: mark which sentances correspond to which requirement

  3. Draw the links between Req-Table and Healthcare/Finance

  4. Describe in which requirements finance and healthcare differ and which ones apply to both

  5. Draw the links between Req-Table and Hyperledger/Ethereum

  6. Describe which requirements Hyperledger and Ethereum fulfil

  7. Describe only the useful DLT characteristics and properties

  8. Think about the trade-offs

Meeting 08.11.21

  1. Working Definition of DP 1-2 sentences

    • "The provenance of a data item includes information about the processes and sources that lead to its creation and current representation"

  2. Try to group Requirements (CIA, Data, System)

  3. Make bigger destinction between individual medical/financial requirements

  4. Add references in requirements.

  5. Medical/Financial use case: differences and similarities

    • anonymity
    • target of abuse
    • accessibility
    • avail - emergency
  6. Hyperledger/Ethereum statements in regard to the medical/financial requirements.

Meeting 01.11.21

  1. References

  2. Describe DP in our case

  3. Stay away from Usage Control, Privacy, Security, anything outside of provenance

  4. Separate requirements in important/unimportant in terms of our use case

  5. Define Roles - Data Subject, Data Sender/Reciever, Type of Data, Transmiting priciple

  6. Find financial literature

Meeting 25.10.21

  1. Finance > Social

  2. Define Data Provenance

  3. Formulate Requirements for Data Provenance

  4. Formulate Requirements specificaly for medical and financial use case

Meeting 13.10.21

  1. Find a second use case (mobility, finance, etc.), which is the furthest from the medical use case

  2. Determine requirements

    • for medical DP tools
    • for second use case DP tools
    • for both

  3. Compare/map to classic/typical privacy and security requirements

  4. Look at as many different DLTs as possible

    • private/public
    • permissioned/permissionless

  5. Mapping results from 2. to DLT characteristics and capabilities from 3.

About

Evaluation of Distributed Ledger Technologies' Suitability for Personal Data Provenance

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published