Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(jest): 42% coverage for libraries/IndexedDB AP-892 #1687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2022

Conversation

drepram
Copy link
Contributor

@drepram drepram commented Feb 24, 2022

What this PR does πŸ“–

Self-explanatory. The reason the coverage is not higher at the moment is that I need an actual mock (and an address) to simulate the forEach loops; I am currently asking David C for it.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes πŸ”¨

AP-892

Special notes for reviewers πŸ—’οΈ

Additional comments 🎀

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Missing Dev Review A Dev and a Dev Approver need to review the PR, then mark as Ready for QA label Feb 24, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 24, 2022

βœ”οΈ Yeeeehaw, deploy preview is ready!

πŸ”¨ Explore the source changes: c315a68

πŸ” Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/adoring-edison-dbcef8/deploys/6217a7a7cd3ad60008a3282f

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1687--adoring-edison-dbcef8.netlify.app

argumentQueryOptions,
)
expect(db.conversations.bulkGet).toHaveBeenCalled()
console.log(result)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need this console.log? πŸ”¨

@stavares843 stavares843 changed the title feat(jest): 42% coverage for libraries/IndexedDB feat(jest): 42% coverage for libraries/IndexedDB AP-892 Feb 24, 2022
@stavares843
Copy link
Member

minor comment

@WanderingHogan
Copy link
Contributor

this is fine but don't add any coverage to the indexeddb work in the near term

@stavares843
Copy link
Member

thanks @WanderingHogan

@WanderingHogan
Copy link
Contributor

we are re-working it all and the tests likely wont be valid

@stavares843 stavares843 merged commit 88c4adb into dev Feb 24, 2022
@stavares843 stavares843 deleted the drepram/qa-indexeddb branch February 24, 2022 20:09
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Missing Dev Review A Dev and a Dev Approver need to review the PR, then mark as Ready for QA label Feb 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants