Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(jest): 47% coverage for utilities/EXIF.ts #2286

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 10, 2022
Merged

feat(jest): 47% coverage for utilities/EXIF.ts #2286

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 10, 2022

Conversation

drepram
Copy link
Contributor

@drepram drepram commented Mar 10, 2022

What this PR does πŸ“–

Self-explanatory. Can be increased, but I've yet to figure out how to trigger the 0xffd8 condition; soon.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes πŸ”¨

AP-592

Special notes for reviewers πŸ—’οΈ

Additional comments 🎀

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Missing Dev Review A Dev and a Dev Approver need to review the PR, then mark as Ready for QA label Mar 10, 2022
@stavares843 stavares843 added the QA tested One QA Person has tested - Needs QA Lead review still label Mar 10, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 10, 2022

βœ”οΈ Yeeeehaw, deploy preview is ready!

πŸ”¨ Explore the source changes: c728403

πŸ” Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/adoring-edison-dbcef8/deploys/622a5027634f7d0008608815

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-2286--adoring-edison-dbcef8.netlify.app

@WanderingHogan WanderingHogan removed the Missing Dev Review A Dev and a Dev Approver need to review the PR, then mark as Ready for QA label Mar 10, 2022
@stavares843 stavares843 merged commit 613706e into dev Mar 10, 2022
@stavares843 stavares843 deleted the AP-592 branch March 10, 2022 20:03
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the QA tested One QA Person has tested - Needs QA Lead review still label Mar 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants