Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(jest): 37% coverage for store/accounts/actions.ts #2343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2022

Conversation

drepram
Copy link
Contributor

@drepram drepram commented Mar 16, 2022

What this PR does 📖

Self-explanatory.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes 🔨

Improved AP-661, though there are certain lines that can't yet be covered due to a lack of knowledge in covering it at the time. More improvements are soon to come.

Special notes for reviewers 🗒️

Additional comments 🎤

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Missing Dev Review A Dev and a Dev Approver need to review the PR, then mark as Ready for QA label Mar 16, 2022
@drepram
Copy link
Contributor Author

drepram commented Mar 16, 2022

I am using this brand new branch because I thought the AP-661 branch still exists with existing code on that branch
image

Turns out it does not on the web, my apologies.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 16, 2022

✔️ Yeeeehaw, deploy preview is ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: ece5276

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/adoring-edison-dbcef8/deploys/6231e6312dee3400093900b6

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-2343--adoring-edison-dbcef8.netlify.app

@WanderingHogan WanderingHogan merged commit 96babb8 into dev Mar 16, 2022
@WanderingHogan WanderingHogan deleted the drepram/accounts-actions-improve-jest branch March 16, 2022 13:59
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Missing Dev Review A Dev and a Dev Approver need to review the PR, then mark as Ready for QA label Mar 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants