Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(idempotent-override): do not omit idempotent from request overrides #19

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2019

Conversation

ole-martin
Copy link
Contributor

@ole-martin ole-martin commented Feb 7, 2019

idempotent should not be in the OUR_CONFIGURATION_PROPERTIES as it is only read from the request object. Removing it enables users to add idempotent property to override behaviour for single requests.
Related issue: #18

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.235% when pulling 1e0439d on ole-martin:master into 3a596c4 on Schibsted-Tech-Polska:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.235% when pulling 1e0439d on ole-martin:master into 3a596c4 on Schibsted-Tech-Polska:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.235% when pulling 1e0439d on ole-martin:master into 3a596c4 on Schibsted-Tech-Polska:master.

@filipgolonka filipgolonka merged commit 2ca3dc6 into Schibsted-Tech-Polska:master Feb 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants