Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name conflict with jorgebucaran/fish-nvm #3

Closed
elliottsj opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Name conflict with jorgebucaran/fish-nvm #3

elliottsj opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@elliottsj
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fish-nvm currently uses the name "fnm" for its command and config file (.fnmrc).

On the bright side, it is currently undergoing a rewrite, including a potential name change, so the conflict may go away once it's complete.

In the meantime, the conflict exists though, so this could result in some confusion for existing users of https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fish-nvm.

@Schniz
Copy link
Owner

Schniz commented Jan 24, 2019

Hi, sorry about that! Choosing a name is hard, and I hope we have had the right choice taking fnm. We chose fnm because:

  • It is meaningful ("fast node manager")
  • It is easy to type (well, at least for me)

That being said, feel free to download it and rename it to however you'd like! I think it can work amazingly well with Fish shell (that I used to use) because it is a binary and not a bash script/function, so I think it worth experimenting 😸

Also, it seems like @jorgebucaran has already renamed his package

Hope that helps! 😸

@Schniz Schniz closed this as completed Jan 24, 2019
@jorgebucaran
Copy link

@Schniz 👋

@elliottsj In the meantime, the conflict exists though, so this could result in some confusion for existing users of https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fish-nvm.

It should be good now.

@Schniz
Copy link
Owner

Schniz commented Jan 25, 2019

Thanks @jorgebucaran!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants