Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompatHelper: bump compat for Copulas to 0.1, (keep existing compat) #134

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request changes the compat entry for the Copulas package from =0.1.13 to =0.1.13, 0.1.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.47059% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.28%. Comparing base (1f12f72) to head (5382533).

Files Patch % Lines
src/shapley_sensitivity.jl 76.47% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #134      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.11%   92.28%   -0.83%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         842      830      -12     
==========================================
- Hits          784      766      -18     
- Misses         58       64       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devmotion devmotion mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2024
if n_dep == 1
dist_cond = Normal(cond_mean[1, 1], cond_var[1, 1])
sample_norm = rand(dist_cond, n_sample)
dist_cond = Normal(cond_mean[1, 1], sqrt(cond_var[1, 1]))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't rerun the tests locally... I wonder if the test errors are caused by this fix (stddev instead of variance).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes that should be it. Fwiw the values for ishigami function are closer to the sobol indices now so it's not suspicious

Copy link
Member

@Vaibhavdixit02 Vaibhavdixit02 Apr 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

closer in a handwavy way lol

@Vaibhavdixit02 Vaibhavdixit02 merged commit 254bc7a into master Apr 4, 2024
8 of 13 checks passed
@Vaibhavdixit02 Vaibhavdixit02 deleted the compathelper/new_version/2023-11-14-23-08-53-265-03909794485 branch April 4, 2024 04:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants