Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Error on precompilation #601

Closed
braamvandyk opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Error on precompilation #601

braamvandyk opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@braamvandyk
Copy link

Just updated to v3.21.0
Julia 1.5.2 (official binaries) on Windows 10

[ Info: Precompiling ModelingToolkit [961ee093-0014-501f-94e3-6117800e7a78]
ERROR: LoadError: LoadError: UndefVarError: AbstractADType not defined
Stacktrace:
 [1] getproperty(::Module, ::Symbol) at .\Base.jl:26
 [2] top-level scope at C:\Users\Braam\.julia\packages\ModelingToolkit\BHRXD\src\systems\optimization\optimizationsystem.jl:88
 [3] include(::Function, ::Module, ::String) at .\Base.jl:380
 [4] include at .\Base.jl:368 [inlined]
 [5] include(::String) at C:\Users\Braam\.julia\packages\ModelingToolkit\BHRXD\src\ModelingToolkit.jl:1
 [6] top-level scope at C:\Users\Braam\.julia\packages\ModelingToolkit\BHRXD\src\ModelingToolkit.jl:114
 [7] include(::Function, ::Module, ::String) at .\Base.jl:380
 [8] include(::Module, ::String) at .\Base.jl:368
 [9] top-level scope at none:2
 [10] eval at .\boot.jl:331 [inlined]
 [11] eval(::Expr) at .\client.jl:467
 [12] top-level scope at .\none:3
in expression starting at C:\Users\Braam\.julia\packages\ModelingToolkit\BHRXD\src\systems\optimization\optimizationsystem.jl:88
in expression starting at C:\Users\Braam\.julia\packages\ModelingToolkit\BHRXD\src\ModelingToolkit.jl:114
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

What version of DiffEqBase?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Oh dang, we should've bumped the lower bound.

ChrisRackauckas added a commit to JuliaRegistries/General that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2020
@ChrisRackauckas
Bump lower bound of DiffEqBase to 6.48 in ModelingToolkit 3.21
6462349 
@DilumAluthge I am not quite sure how to use RegistryTools.jl to do this, so I did it by hand. Could this be checked? We missed an important lower bound:

SciML/DifferentialEquations.jl#683
SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl#601
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2020
Merged
ChrisRackauckas added a commit to JuliaRegistries/General that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2020
@ChrisRackauckas
Bump lower bound of DiffEqBase to 6.48 in ModelingToolkit 3.21 (#22615)
6e6ca88 
@DilumAluthge I am not quite sure how to use RegistryTools.jl to do this, so I did it by hand. Could this be checked? We missed an important lower bound:

SciML/DifferentialEquations.jl#683
SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl#601
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Fixed with an appropriate lower bound: JuliaRegistries/General#22615 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ChrisRackauckas @braamvandyk