Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Kronecker sequences #50

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ParadaCarleton
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Run the formatter.

using JuliaFormatter
format("path/to/repo")

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit bd94dbe into SciML:master Oct 25, 2022
@ParadaCarleton ParadaCarleton deleted the kroneckerfix branch October 26, 2022 00:12
end
GoldenSample() = GoldenSample(zero(Float64))

function sample(n::Integer, d::Integer, g::GoldenSample{T}) where {T}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ParadaCarleton it looks like these are missing the standard lb,ub dispatches?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ParadaCarleton it looks like these are missing the standard lb,ub dispatches?

Yes, it looks like it. I'll make a PR that creates a generic lb and ub method, so we don't have to rewrite a new one for every function and can just implement a generic sampler.

Is there a way to test downstream packages to make sure nothing breaks in the future?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants