Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GaussAdjoint to docs #876

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 15, 2023
Merged

Add GaussAdjoint to docs #876

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 15, 2023

Conversation

acoh64
Copy link
Contributor

@acoh64 acoh64 commented Aug 15, 2023

PR for #866

I will update more once I implement checkpointing, SDES, and Functor/non-vector parameters

Copy link

@ai-maintainer ai-maintainer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Add GaussAdjoint to docs

Title and Description 👍

The title is clear and concise The title "Add GaussAdjoint to docs" effectively communicates the purpose of the changes. However, the description could be improved. It would be helpful to have a more detailed description that explains the motivation behind adding `GaussAdjoint` to the documentation and any other relevant information about the implementation.

Scope of Changes 👍

The changes are narrowly focused The changes in this PR are focused on adding documentation for the `GaussAdjoint` method. The author mentions future work on checkpointing, SDES, and Functor/non-vector parameters, but these do not appear to be part of the current changes.

Testing ⚠️

Testing details are missing The description does not mention how the author tested the changes. It would be helpful to have information about the testing approach used by the author to ensure the correctness and functionality of the added documentation for `GaussAdjoint`.

Docstrings ⚠️

Docstrings are missing for the new function The newly added function `GaussAdjoint` does not have a docstring describing its behavior, arguments, and return values. It would be beneficial to add a docstring for this function.

Suggested Changes

  • Please provide a more detailed description of the changes in the PR description.
  • Please provide information about how you tested the changes.
  • Please add a docstring for the GaussAdjoint function describing its behavior, arguments, and return values.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 6c2868c into SciML:master Aug 15, 2023
21 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants