Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor examples for readability #247

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 30, 2024

Conversation

emrgnt-cmplxty
Copy link
Contributor

@emrgnt-cmplxty emrgnt-cmplxty commented Mar 29, 2024

Ellipsis 🚀 This PR description was created by Ellipsis for commit 8bf1cc3.

Summary:

This PR refactors the example scripts for better organization and readability, and makes minor code adjustments for clarity.

Key points:

  • Refactored example scripts for better organization and readability.
  • Moved example scripts to appropriate directories (/r2r/examples/servers and /r2r/examples/clients).
  • Renamed example scripts to reflect their functionality.
  • Minor code adjustments for clarity in several files.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 29, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
r2r-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 29, 2024 10:00pm

@emrgnt-cmplxty emrgnt-cmplxty force-pushed the feature/refactor-examples-for-readability branch from c071806 to bc3d7a6 Compare March 29, 2024 21:58
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me!

  • Reviewed the entire pull request up to 8bf1cc3
  • Looked at 1075 lines of code in 40 files
  • Took 2 minutes and 20 seconds to review
More info
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of 50%.
1. r2r/examples/servers/web_search_pipeline.py:16:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The code is clean and follows best practices. Good job!
  • Reasoning:
    The code in the file web_search_pipeline.py is clean and follows best practices. It imports necessary modules, creates a pipeline using the WebSearchRAGPipeline implementation, and runs the FastAPI application using Uvicorn if the script is run directly. There are no logical bugs, performance bugs, or security bugs in this part of the code. The comments are clear and helpful.
2. r2r/core/utils/splitter/text.py:229:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes improve the readability of the code. Good job!
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the text.py file are minor and improve the readability of the code. The use of parentheses to break the ternary operation across multiple lines makes the code easier to read and understand. There are no logical bugs, performance bugs, or security bugs in this part of the code.
3. docs/pages/core-features/app.mdx:34:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes improve the readability of the documentation. Good job!
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the app.mdx file improve the readability of the documentation. The command to launch the application has been simplified, which makes it easier for users to understand and use. The description of the command is clear and accurate. There are no issues with these changes.
4. docs/pages/examples/basic-example.mdx:1:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes improve the readability of the documentation. Good job!
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the basic-example.mdx file improve the readability of the documentation. The example has been broken down into clear steps, which makes it easier for users to understand and follow. The descriptions of the steps are clear and accurate. There are no issues with these changes.
5. docs/pages/examples/chat-pdf.mdx:1:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes improve the readability of the documentation. Good job!
  • Reasoning:
    The changes in the chat-pdf.mdx file improve the readability of the documentation. The example has been broken down into clear steps, which makes it easier for users to understand and follow. The descriptions of the steps are clear and accurate. There are no issues with these changes.

Workflow ID: wflow_Kw77gkPayB0ln8Ku


Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.

@emrgnt-cmplxty emrgnt-cmplxty merged commit 606727b into main Mar 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@emrgnt-cmplxty emrgnt-cmplxty deleted the feature/refactor-examples-for-readability branch April 1, 2024 07:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant