86Box: Add version 3.11 (+ roms 3.11 + manager 1.7.4) #10526
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It should be noted that this code is based on manifests from a scoop bucket by @amorphobia, found here. Thank you for those! |
|
/verify |
|
All changes look good. Wait for review from human collaborators. 86box-manager
86box-roms
86box
|
Fixed these artifacts from my personal scoop repo. They all now point to the correct manifests. |
|
/verify |
|
All changes look good. Wait for review from human collaborators. 86box-manager
86box-roms
86box
|
HUMORCE
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the 86Box suite of early x86 system emulation tools. Specifically, it adds three manifests:
86box.json- the 86Box emulator86box-roms.json- the official collection of required roms86box-manager.json- the GUI front-end for 86BoxAll have been tested locally, including checkver/autoupdate. However, I welcome anyone to double-check.