2021-05-Stephen-Whitenstall-SecretDecks-ContributionSurvey #43
Comments
|
I approve ✅ Love it 💟 that you are asking for a Major Arcana NFT! @evolayak Can you please give a second approval? |
|
@stephen-rowan I checked mentoring on the form and wrote my name next the "contribution vote" - that's what it's for right? |
|
@DanM3rcurius - I checked "mentoring" as a catch-all for "general advice". |
Yes! I was thinking sth along the lines of a short video, tweet, post that could reference or shortly describe the intangible work done. Example: <Thanks to (at)Stephen I now know where to find the material I'm looking for> ; or <(at)Dan took the time to introduce me to the project and answer many questions I had>. Didn't you dabbled with SourceCred @stephen-rowan , what guide/tutorial did you use? I might look into setting this up. Maybe play around with it together with @wlstylr? |
|
closing the survey now. Not sure if heather will have time to review in next weeks, as she's traveling. |
|
Hi! Sure! I can look at the survey later today/evening if that’s ok?
Sent from ProtonMail for iOS
…On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:13, Dan V3r0wski ***@***.***> wrote:
closing the survey now. Not sure if heather will have time to review in next weeks, as she's traveling.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#43 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT7DTR7XIDEQAPFQS7UTQRLTULZMTANCNFSM46BPZB4A).
|
|
No pressure, please do enjoy your vacation (:
As it's one of the first survey's I guess it's ok if only 1 reviewer signs off.For the next one (June) we should each have 2 reviewers signing off.
Cheers,
D
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
…On Thursday, June 24th, 2021 at 11:36, evolayak ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi! Sure! I can look at the survey later today/evening if that’s ok?
Sent from ProtonMail for iOS
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:13, Dan V3r0wski ***@***.***> wrote:
> closing the survey now. Not sure if heather will have time to review in next weeks, as she's traveling.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
> Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#43 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT7DTR7XIDEQAPFQS7UTQRLTULZMTANCNFSM46BPZB4A).
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#43 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATEKE7TDQO5I3RCVWK5SXZ3TUL4BXANCNFSM46BPZB4A).
|
|
All good, I don’t want to totally disconnect; better for me mentally to stay engaged a bit :) I will have a look this evening.
Ciao!
Sent from ProtonMail for iOS
…On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 13:20, Dan V3r0wski ***@***.***> wrote:
No pressure, please do enjoy your vacation (:
As it's one of the first survey's I guess it's ok if only 1 reviewer signs off.For the next one (June) we should each have 2 reviewers signing off.
Cheers,
D
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, June 24th, 2021 at 11:36, evolayak ***@***.***> wrote:
> Hi! Sure! I can look at the survey later today/evening if that’s ok?
>
> Sent from ProtonMail for iOS
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:13, Dan V3r0wski ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>> closing the survey now. Not sure if heather will have time to review in next weeks, as she's traveling.
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
>> Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#43 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT7DTR7XIDEQAPFQS7UTQRLTULZMTANCNFSM46BPZB4A).
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
> Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#43 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATEKE7TDQO5I3RCVWK5SXZ3TUL4BXANCNFSM46BPZB4A).
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#43 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT7DTR4LFZMHEHFS22UFYCTTUMBFJANCNFSM46BPZB4A).
|
|
Approved! Also love the Major Arcana NFT ask! :D |
Autonomous Creator Organisation (ACO) - Contribution-Survey
Detailed Expalanation below
General Information
This provides an overall summary or context of a member, when they became involved and how many days they have worked.
This could be supplemented with a contribution vote by peers to capture the more intangible contribution a member has made.
Work areas
A member can indicate the different work areas they have worked in and provide an estimate of Days / Hours worked in each area.
The areas are Development , Marketing, Governance, Business, Creative, Product and Intangible work.
Intangible work is meant to capture contributions not covered by the scope of a work area.
Cost calculations (to be decided)
Hours/Days worked - Costs
A variable rate may be applied depending up the cost/rate of the contributor (their hourly rate and work costs).
Development
Each work area will be divided into appropriate categories (e.g. Code, UX etc.) and be accompanied with an "Outputs" section where members can record what they have produced, built, documented etc.
Marketing
Governance
Business
Product
Creative - Art
Intangible work
Peer Review
Group
After the survey each contribution is assessed for due diligence by the appropriate work area Group - to confirm that there is agreement that the work took place etc.
ACO
After the survey - intangibles are voted upon per member by the ACO.
Reward and evaluation
Once the above process is completed a member may choose either to be awarded -
Autonomous Creator Organisation (ACO) - Contribution-Survey
The key approach is to capture contributions first and assess value last.
Detailed Expalanation below
Why ? Because value led models typically dictate the nature of contributions e.g. a financial incentive contribution model will tend to favor immediate returns, an equal share of rewards upfront will penalize those who have contributed more than others etc.
A contribution led model either tracks or audits ACO member contributions first. Then rewards (in ADA) or recognition (in a Token) are applied to the contribution data afterwards.
Identity
This survey encourages ACO members to identify themselves as it provides a record of their contribution.
However an anon ID option should be available and peer reviewed per work area.
DAO Contribution-Survey Design by Stephen Whitenstall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: