We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We've implemented this for explainers under #685
The approach is to specify a ServiceAccountName which should link to secrets. So the same as KFServing (https://github.com/kubeflow/kfserving/tree/9b14e08038405348ac21f1acbbf8b26e4c26631d/docs/samples/s3) and the same format. In order to align even the same annotations are are supported, though machinelearning.seldon.io ones can be used instead (there is a check for both). That's for s3 but GCS should also work, though I don't have an example currently.
This issue is to extend to prepackaged model servers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ryandawsonuk
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We've implemented this for explainers under #685
The approach is to specify a ServiceAccountName which should link to secrets. So the same as KFServing (https://github.com/kubeflow/kfserving/tree/9b14e08038405348ac21f1acbbf8b26e4c26631d/docs/samples/s3) and the same format. In order to align even the same annotations are are supported, though machinelearning.seldon.io ones can be used instead (there is a check for both). That's for s3 but GCS should also work, though I don't have an example currently.
This issue is to extend to prepackaged model servers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: