New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #197, fixes #199: revamp inactive-blog-filter and tests #395
Conversation
Do you think it's possible to split updating |
That might be a bit tricky, Paul, as the updated |
Alright, that makes sense. It might take a little bit to review, since it's somewhat of a big change. |
Sure thing; thanks for all the help! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall it looks good, I couldn't find any problems running it. Good work 👍!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is pretty good. I've ran the tests on my computer and haven't encountered any issues on my end.
Fixes #197: builds upon #211 and #380 to boost testing coverage for
inactive-blog-filter.js
into the green (representing a significant step towards the resolution of #268).Fixes #199: both the
check()
andupdate()
functions ofinactive-blog-filter.js
now use fs.promises. Thank you, @MeisterRed, for agreeing to collaborate!