Add support for kind Job

[superbrothers]

Description

This PR adds support for kind Job. Currently, Job is an unsupported resource in kubeaudit.

---------------- Results for ---------------

  apiVersion: batch/v1
  kind: Job

--------------------------------------------

-- [warning] Unsupported resource
   Message: Resource is not currently supported.

Type of change

• Bug fix 🐛
• New feature ✨
• This change requires a documentation update 📖
• Breaking changes ⚠️

How Has This Been Tested?

$ make test
./test.sh
Starting tests. This may take a while...
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ksuda/src/github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit'
kind create cluster --name "kubeaudit-test" --image kindest/node:v1.15.0
Creating cluster "kubeaudit-test" ...
 ✓ Ensuring node image (kindest/node:v1.15.0) 🖼
 ✓ Preparing nodes 📦
 ✓ Writing configuration 📜
 ✓ Starting control-plane 🕹️
 ✓ Installing CNI 🔌
Could not read storage manifest, falling back on old k8s.io/host-path default ...
 ✓ Installing StorageClass 💾
Set kubectl context to "kind-kubeaudit-test"
You can now use your cluster with:

kubectl cluster-info --context kind-kubeaudit-test

Thanks for using kind! 😊
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ksuda/src/github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit'
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit    0.256s  coverage: 71.6% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/all       37.277s coverage: 92.6% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/apparmor  21.842s coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/asat      22.415s coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/capabilities      22.476s coverage: 94.8% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/hostns    22.451s coverage: 92.1% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/image     22.081s coverage: 96.4% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/limits    22.299s coverage: 98.6% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/mounts    107.929s        coverage: 89.2% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/netpols   6.172s  coverage: 90.4% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/nonroot   84.773s coverage: 95.7% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/privesc   22.208s coverage: 100.0% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/privileged        22.170s coverage: 95.5% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/rootfs    22.169s coverage: 95.5% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/auditors/seccomp   22.105s coverage: 100.0% of statements
?       github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/cmd        [no test files]
?       github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/cmd/commands       [no test files]
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/config     0.053s  coverage: 57.1% of statements
?       github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/internal/color     [no test files]
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/internal/k8sinternal       0.298s  coverage: 83.9% of statements
?       github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/internal/test      [no test files]
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/internal/yaml      0.028s  coverage: 89.0% of statements
ok      github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/pkg/fix    0.050s  coverage: 94.4% of statements
?       github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/pkg/k8s    [no test files]
?       github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit/pkg/override       [no test files]
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ksuda/src/github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit'
kind delete cluster --name "kubeaudit-test"
Deleting cluster "kubeaudit-test" ...
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ksuda/src/github.com/Shopify/kubeaudit'

Checklist:

• I have 🎩 my changes (A 🎩 specifically includes pulling down changes, setting them up, and manually testing the changed features and potential side effects to make sure nothing is broken)
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• The test coverage did not decrease: I added a new fixture.: I could not check coverage decreased or not because tests failed on the main branch.
• I have signed the appropriate Contributor License Agreement

[ghost]

Thanks for opening this pull request! Please check out our contributing guidelines and sign the CLA.

[genevieveluyt]

Looks great, thanks so much for your contribution @superbrothers !

[ghost]

Congrats on merging your first pull request, keep em coming!