Prune contract-sector links from the db if a host can't find the sector #643
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ChrisSchinnerl
commented
Oct 4, 2023
api/bus.go
Outdated
| @@ -722,3 +722,8 @@ type AddPartialSlabResponse struct { | |||
| func FormatETag(ETag string) string { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Leaving a comment to prevent this from getting merged by accident. After approval I'd like to test it on a node before merging.
peterjan
reviewed
Oct 5, 2023
peterjan
reviewed
Oct 5, 2023
peterjan
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To make sure a sector that a host lost doesn't prevent
renterdfrom performing migrations this PR adds pruning to the db. This doesn't relief the host from its duty to store the sector. It only tells the autopilot that the health of the slab is getting worse.