Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The model: gpt-4 does not exist / fixing defaults in llm_utils.py #4229

Closed
1 task done
Boostrix opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 1 comment 路 Fixed by #4278
Closed
1 task done

The model: gpt-4 does not exist / fixing defaults in llm_utils.py #4229

Boostrix opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 1 comment 路 Fixed by #4278
Labels
function: config good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@Boostrix
Copy link
Contributor

Boostrix commented May 15, 2023 •
edited

Duplicates

  • I have searched the existing issues

Summary 馃挕

the defaults need to be adapted for people without access to GPT4 - or the corresponding functions won't work.
The default model for people without GPT4 access should be cfg.fast_llm_model and not cfg.smart_llm_model

It would probably make sense to check once during startup what model is available and then set up the default accordingly.
In general, GPT4 should only be a default setting once it is verified to be available.

Examples 馃寛

No response

Motivation 馃敠

No response
This was referenced May 16, 2023
Merged
Closed
@konraddroeske
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request: #4278

@konraddroeske konraddroeske mentioned this issue May 18, 2023
Merged
6 tasks
k-boikov added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2023
@konraddroeske @k-boikov
Fixed #4229 (#4278)
57ea7b5 
Co-authored-by: k-boikov <64261260+k-boikov@users.noreply.github.com>
ppetermann pushed a commit to ppetermann/Auto-GPT that referenced this issue May 22, 2023
@konraddroeske @k-boikov @ppetermann
Fixed Significant-Gravitas#4229 (Significant-Gravitas#4278)
a03dac6 
Co-authored-by: k-boikov <64261260+k-boikov@users.noreply.github.com>
@Boostrix Boostrix mentioned this issue Jun 5, 2023
Closed
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
function: config good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fixed #4229 konraddroeske/Auto-GPT
2 participants
@konraddroeske @Boostrix