Allow changes to Spec

[ntindle]

User description

Adds multiple POST/DELETE Routes to the specification creation to allow for editing the specification

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Bug fix, Tests

---

Description

• Added multiple POST/DELETE routes for managing specifications, modules, routes, and parameters.
• Refactored SpecificationResponse to include modules and database schema.
• Simplified JSON response content creation across various modules.
• Added functions to fetch API route and module by ID.
• Updated imports to use models from api_model.
• Added configuration for CodiumAI test generation.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	14 files api.py Simplify JSON response content creation                                    codex/api.py Removed unnecessary json import. Simplified JSON response content creation. +2/-3      api_model.py Add models for specification updates and refactor responses codex/api_model.py Added multiple new models for specification updates. Refactored SpecificationResponse to include modules and database schema. +189/-6  logging.py Simplify JSON response content creation                                    codex/common/logging.py Removed unnecessary json import. Simplified JSON response content creation. +1/-2      model.py Remove redundant model definitions                                              codex/common/model.py Removed ObjectTypeModel and ObjectFieldModel definitions. +1/-62    database.py Add functions to fetch API route and module by ID                codex/database.py Added functions to get API route and module by ID. +23/-1    routes.py Simplify JSON response content creation                                    codex/deploy/routes.py Removed unnecessary json import. Simplified JSON response content creation. +1/-2      function_visitor.py Update imports for object models                                                  codex/develop/function_visitor.py Updated imports to use ObjectFieldModel and ObjectTypeModel from api_model. +2/-6      routes.py Add endpoint for creating deliverable route                            codex/develop/routes.py Removed unnecessary json import. Simplified JSON response content creation. Added endpoint to create deliverable route. +74/-3    routes.py Simplify JSON response content creation                                    codex/interview/routes.py Removed unnecessary json import. Simplified JSON response content creation. +1/-2      ai_database.py Update imports for database models                                              codex/requirements/blocks/ai_database.py Updated imports to use DatabaseEnums, DatabaseSchema, and DatabaseTable from api_model. +2/-7      ai_endpoint.py Update imports for object models                                                  codex/requirements/blocks/ai_endpoint.py Updated imports to use ObjectFieldModel and ObjectTypeModel from api_model. +1/-1      database.py Add functions to manage modules, routes, and parameters in specifications codex/requirements/database.py Added functions to manage modules and routes in specifications. Added functions to manage parameters in routes. +230/-2  model.py Remove redundant database model definitions                            codex/requirements/model.py Removed redundant database model definitions. +1/-32    routes.py Add endpoints to manage modules, routes, and parameters    codex/requirements/routes.py Added endpoints to manage modules, routes, and parameters in specifications. +212/-14
Tests	4 files endpoint_fixing_test.py Update imports for object models in tests                                codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py Updated imports to use ObjectFieldModel and ObjectTypeModel from api_model. +1/-1      frontend_gen_test.py Update imports and add interactions field in tests              codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py Updated imports to use ObjectFieldModel and ObjectTypeModel from api_model. Added interactions field in sample app creation. +3/-3      gen_test.py Update imports for database and object models in tests      codex/tests/gen_test.py Updated imports to use ObjectFieldModel, DatabaseEnums, DatabaseSchema, and DatabaseTable from api_model. +9/-9      model_test.py Update imports for object models in tests                                codex/tests/model_test.py Updated imports to use ObjectFieldModel and ObjectTypeModel from api_model. +2/-1
Configuration changes	1 files .codiumai.toml Add CodiumAI test generation configuration                              .codiumai.toml Added configuration for CodiumAI test generation. +525/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[linear]

AGPT-728

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit ed5b719)

Action: code-quality

Failed stage: Run ruff formatter [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed due to a linting error detected by the static analysis tool. Specifically, the variable compiled_route in the file codex/develop/routes.py at line 183 is assigned a value but is never used in the code. This unused variable issue caused the process to exit with code 1, indicating failure.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 461: pythonLocation: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64 462: PKG_CONFIG_PATH: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64/lib/pkgconfig 463: Python_ROOT_DIR: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64 464: Python2_ROOT_DIR: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64 465: Python3_ROOT_DIR: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64 466: LD_LIBRARY_PATH: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64/lib 467: ##[endgroup] 468: codex/develop/routes.py:183:9: F841 Local variable `compiled_route` is assigned to but never used 469: Found 1 error. 470: No fixes available (1 hidden fix can be enabled with the `--unsafe-fixes` option). 471: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Description updated to latest commit (72fad42)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR introduces extensive changes across multiple files, including API routes, database interactions, and model updates. The complexity of the changes, especially with the introduction of new models and the refactoring of existing ones, requires a thorough review to ensure consistency and correctness.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The removal of JSON serialization (json.dumps) in response objects across various files might affect the expected content type and structure of the responses. It's crucial to ensure that the JSONResponse object handles the dictionary input correctly without explicit serialization.
	Refactoring Risk: Significant changes in the models and database schema could lead to issues if not all dependencies and usages have been correctly updated to align with the new structures.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Raise a more specific exception when the specification is not found Instead of raising a generic Exception when the specification is not found, consider raising a more specific exception, such as ValueError or a custom exception. This will make error handling more precise and meaningful. codex/requirements/database.py [243] -raise Exception("Specification not found") +raise ValueError("Specification not found") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using a more specific exception like ValueError instead of a generic Exception is a best practice for clearer error handling and debugging.	8
	Replace multiple inheritance with composition to avoid potential conflicts The SpecificationUpdate class inherits from both prisma.models.Specification and BaseModel. This can lead to issues if both parent classes define the same attributes or methods. Consider using composition instead of multiple inheritance to avoid potential conflicts. codex/api_model.py [152-153] -class SpecificationUpdate(prisma.models.Specification, BaseModel): +class SpecificationUpdate(BaseModel): + specification: prisma.models.Specification apiRouteSpecs: List[APIRouteSpecModel] = [] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue with multiple inheritance which can lead to conflicts and maintenance issues. Using composition as suggested would indeed improve the design and robustness of the code.	8
Enhancement	Use a structured error response format for better error handling and debugging Instead of converting the exception to a string directly in the JSON response, consider using a more structured error response format. This can help in better error handling and debugging. codex/common/logging.py [54] -content={"error": str(e)}, +content={"error": {"type": type(e).__name__, "message": str(e), "details": traceback.format_exc()}}, Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion to use a structured error response format is crucial for better error handling and debugging, which can significantly improve maintainability and clarity in error reporting.	8