Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research Documentation Generators #36

Open
mimiflynn opened this issue Oct 27, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Research Documentation Generators #36

mimiflynn opened this issue Oct 27, 2015 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mimiflynn
Copy link
Contributor

JSDoc?

@mimiflynn mimiflynn self-assigned this Oct 27, 2015
@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

JSDoc!

@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

Seriously though... JSDoc

@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

I guess we should make a separate branch to add the documentation to existing functions?

@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

Or should this just go right in Main since it's an ongoing thing...

@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

Been using API Blueprint - it's nice, but a bit redundant to GItHubs ReadMe format, I think.

@mimiflynn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think a separate branch for initial implementation would be good.

Tell me more about API Blueprint and why you think its redundant? Can it be used instead / with of the Github readme? Like to generate them?

I'll google it when i get a moment ;)

@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

API BluePrint is written in a language very similar to the GitHub ReadMe markdown, but specializes in generating extra bits for things like request status (ie: 500, 404, 403 etc). I think it might be excessive for what we're doing and doesn't seem to have a direct tie-in to code (like an NPM module). I think JSDoc should be robust enough, is there a markdown template for JSDoc?

@SandyGifford
Copy link
Contributor

Because if not I'm going to make one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants