Allowing optional validation #318
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jleandroperez
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2014
Allowing optional validation
|
looks good, thanks! |
|
@jphribovsek you're very welcome! |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to issue #311
Database Validation involves checking every object stored in each bucket, and initializing any object that might not have a valid simperiumKey or ghostData. This is a necessary step when implementing Simperium on top of legacy databases.
By allowing optional validation, app developers can opt out, when needed, and increase performance on launch.