Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Get-RoleMember should return Role and User rather than AccountList #637

Closed
michaellwest opened this issue May 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Get-RoleMember should return Role and User rather than AccountList #637

michaellwest opened this issue May 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
area-commands Involves functions and cmdlets. area-platform impact-breaking-change Made it better than before. Hopefully not too big of an inconvenience.
Milestone
4.1

Comments

@michaellwest
Copy link
Member

The command already returns the data but requires you to enumerate the AccountList. Instead I would prefer the pipeline to contain User and Role objects.
@michaellwest michaellwest self-assigned this May 15, 2016
@michaellwest michaellwest added impact-breaking-change Made it better than before. Hopefully not too big of an inconvenience. area-platform area-commands Involves functions and cmdlets. labels May 15, 2016
@michaellwest michaellwest added this to the 4.1 milestone May 15, 2016
michaellwest added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2016
@michaellwest
#637 : Updated command to return user and role objects rather than ac…
41d4e2e 
…countlist.
@michaellwest
Copy link
Member Author

Implemented.

@AdamNaj
Copy link
Member

AdamNaj commented May 18, 2016

Makes a lot of sense to stream those.
I understand this is now closed.

@AdamNaj AdamNaj closed this as completed May 18, 2016
@michaellwest michaellwest removed their assignment May 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-commands Involves functions and cmdlets. area-platform impact-breaking-change Made it better than before. Hopefully not too big of an inconvenience.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@michaellwest @AdamNaj