We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would like to see if we will consider doing this for Skygear NEXT since it will break some backward compatibility:
Reasons for the switch:
Some reference read:
Remove this section if the feature have no API
Put a list of open questions here before a complete design / specification is decided
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Specify session mechanism and APIs
16c66be
ref #202, #255
No branches or pull requests
Description
Would like to see if we will consider doing this for Skygear NEXT since it will break some backward compatibility:
Reasons for the switch:
Some reference read:
API Design
Remove this section if the feature have no API
Open Questions
Put a list of open questions here before a complete design / specification is decided
Related Issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: