New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't approve me, work in progress for cryptokitties xml #39
Conversation
And with the XML, I'm getting: pattern-type 00100 = 4 = ? (should be amur) Am I doing it wrong?
Update: was looking up wrong kitty ID (80059 instead of 80058). Have updated above |
Also, do we support specifying the bitmask as both binary and hex strings? i.e. the parser has to read the length to determine if it is binary/hex? Or should we just use hex? (kitty's is in binary and ticket's is in hex now) |
@hboon hmmm, seems the image I am basing off from the article does not match the reality? |
@colourful-land bump |
@James-Sangalli I might be parsing the numbers incorrectly. Would be good if you can help verify. But it does seem to be missing some of the cattribute values. |
@James-Sangalli it seems the XML's bitmask assumes a reversed order of the gene groups: For example, body which is this in the XML:
should be: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Similarly: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011111000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 eye-type/shape But unless there's another source, we'll have to figure out the missing cattribute values ourselves. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't approve this unless the repo server is updated to handle directory hierarchy since you created a subdirectory in this branch.
@James-Sangalli 1) suggest to split this into 2 pr in the future since "sort into folders" is a big change. 2) Approve this first so I can approve yours: AlphaWallet/alpha-wallet-android#299 |
@James-Sangalli says this one should wait - don't approve it because he is still working on it |
Replaced by services like OpenSea |
for #34
@James-Sangalli sorted stuff into sub-directories in this pR>