05-24 filenaming and some fixes

[Bai825]

Description

1. Removed the Generic in filament naming.
2. Add the "@ff" format in filament naming.
3. Updated the gcode start command： E-0.2.
4. Fix the filament type for FusRock S-Multi and FusRock S-PAHT.

Screenshots/Recordings/Graphs

See changed files in the commit.

Tests

Worked on local OrcaSlicer portable package.

@SoftFever For your review.

[SoftFever]

Can you check and fix the errors reported by the "Check profiles"?

[Bai825]

Can you check and fix the errors reported by the "Check profiles"?

Yes, this error occurred before.

@RikshaDriver I seemed not be able to locate the issues from the prompt. I also fixed the naming for AD3 machine profile. Can you help me check on the below prompt and is there any other method I can debug locally before making a PR?

[RikshaDriver]

The test is referencing the old "Generic" filaments.

@SoftFever does the check script require manual updating if filaments have been removed/renamed?

[SoftFever]

It is not suppose to rename/delete existing profiles as it will invalidate users' custom profile based them.

[RikshaDriver]

It is not suppose to rename/delete existing profiles as it will invalidate users' custom profile based them.

@SoftFever @Bai825 it may be worthwhile looking at developing a "profile migration" tool if filament/nozzle profile renaming is required.

[Bai825]

It is not suppose to rename/delete existing profiles as it will invalidate users' custom profile based them.

I see. Guess I will continue with the old naming style for now. Will try to make another PR with the existing naming later. Thanks!

[Bai825]

It is not suppose to rename/delete existing profiles as it will invalidate users' custom profile based them.

@SoftFever @Bai825 it may be worthwhile looking at developing a "profile migration" tool if filament/nozzle profile renaming is required.

Agree, that will help with situations when one wants to make things cleaner if there are too many profiles in different naming rules.