Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MTM-41851 C# REST SDK to be on par with Java #3

Conversation

ashhSAG93
Copy link
Contributor

@ashhSAG93 ashhSAG93 commented Oct 25, 2021

MTM-41851 C# REST SDK to be on par with Java

@ashhSAG93 ashhSAG93 changed the title C# REST SDK to be on par with Java MTM-41851 C# REST SDK to be on par with Java Oct 25, 2021
Copy link

@bbyreddy bbyreddy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @ashhSAG93,
Based on my understanding of C#, I did review, but we may need a short session together to get more clarity on certain aspects.
A couple of observations

  1. We are in general missing journal logging (both old and new code), which needs to be improved without significantly affecting the performance.
  2. Also, I see you have added many tests, which is very good. But since there are so many changes, it would be easier to generate a code coverage report and implement more tests to cover the missing classes/methods and code lines.

Thanks,
Bhaskar.

Copy link

@miryalarahul miryalarahul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implement the comments

Copy link

@miryalarahul miryalarahul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@ashhSAG93 ashhSAG93 merged commit bf50b7b into master Nov 8, 2021
@ashhSAG93 ashhSAG93 deleted the MTM-41851-Implement-the-identified-gaps-in-C#-REST-SDK-to-make-on-par-with-java-REST-SDK branch November 8, 2021 06:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants