Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Collection object filter is not finding containerized identifiers #1240

Closed
tmcelrath opened this issue Dec 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Collection object filter is not finding containerized identifiers #1240

tmcelrath opened this issue Dec 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Suggest an improvement to an existing function.

Comments

@tmcelrath
Copy link

Describe the bug

Collection object filter is not finding containerized identifiers when searching by identifier or identifier range.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. When I go to "Collection Object Filter" task.
  2. Then I search for an identifier or range of identifiers, where the identifier I am searching for is "containerized".
  3. And I search.
  4. Get no results for that identifier. But I can find the specimen if I search by a different attribute, e.g. Taxon name.

Expected behavior
Should be able to search for an identifier even if containerized.

Collection object in question (Insect Collection 39678)
image

Blank namespace and partial matching search:
image

Results (note lack of requested identifer):
image

INHS Namespace and "range of identifiers" search:
image

Results (note lack of identifier 39678):
image

Environment (please identify where you experience this bug:

  • Production
  • Chrome
@tmcelrath tmcelrath added the bug An existing function is broken. label Dec 16, 2019
@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

Note that containerized specimens still show up when searching by other attributes, e.g. Taxon name.

@mjy mjy added enhancement Suggest an improvement to an existing function. and removed bug An existing function is broken. labels Dec 16, 2019
@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Dec 16, 2019

Techncially not a bug, we didn't initially intend for this. Marking as enhancement.

@mjy mjy self-assigned this Dec 16, 2019
@mjy mjy added this to future in Specimen digitization Mar 24, 2020
@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Feb 27, 2023

Coming in unified.

Screenshot 2023-02-27 at 12 31 10 PM

@mjy mjy closed this as completed Mar 7, 2023
@mjy mjy moved this from future to done in Specimen digitization Aug 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Suggest an improvement to an existing function.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants