Add setAll() and clearAll() for Data #1078
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context, Motivation & Description
Sometimes I need to zero out an entire bundle, but assigning each bundle signal is tedious, especially for multi-level Bundles. I ended up using the method in the PR as it's simple and uses some of the most basic methods available (even for Data), so I figured that it could be added directly to
Data
. Let me know if that's the place for this sort of general method, or should it be higher up in the hard type hierarchy?Also, I noticed that this pattern is often used in RegIf, so I changed it as well to use the new construct from Data.
Impact on code generation
None, convenience function for
Data
, which is already implemented forBitVector
and some of its children.Checklist
/** */
?