New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ongoing Minor Issue List (OCD List) SpongeDocs Edition #437
Comments
|
|
Also Sponge -> SpongeForge Another tick for #437
|
|
|
At plugin/injection, there is some text that reads Also in that file, towards the bottom, there is some text that reads |
I think it was meant to read |
|
A couple of issues raised by translators:
|
The permissions docs suggest using the plugin id as the 'root permisison node'. The example is |
|
A new one found by tomudding:
|
|
|
https://docs.spongepowered.org/stable/en/plugin/scheduler.html#task-properties For the task name:
The plugin id should be |
This will eventually clear out #437
OK, Everything here has been fixed up to this point in PR #616 - let me know if anything's awry. |
https://docs.spongepowered.org/stable/en/server/spongineer/commands.html Should mention the /minecraft:xyz fallbacks in an info box. |
The text https://github.com/SpongePowered/SpongeDocs/blame/stable/source/plugin/blocks/concepts.rst#L13 |
Regarding the |
|
|
Is:
Should be:
(Remove duplicate bracket) As reported by #668 . |
is:
Mentioned by @Dannyps on IRC:
|
An error in the documentation or something I do not understand? |
@ImagePrototype Yes thats an error in the documentation: Should probably be: if (onlinePlayer.isPresent()) {
return onlinePlayer.map(v -> v);
} But this piece of code looks too confusing anyway. We should probably ask the API team for the recommended way to do it. EDIT: According to killjoy checking the online players first is unnecessary overhead. |
That one probably justifies a separate issue, if only so we can add a reviewer or two. It certainly seems to be larger than the usual trivial issues we put here. |
A few Terms of Service related issues:
|
I have 7 more commits ready for another PR. I am going through this list and checking for more changes I can make. I hope to have a PR ready in the next day or two. |
I have commits ready for the following issues:
I can do the work for the following issues; I just need some guidance and/or decisions from someone more familiar with the documentation/code:
Once these issues are resolved, the only remaining issue after PR #616 is the SpongeAPI vs Sponge API comments starting with tomudding. ImMorpheus' comment is complete AFAICT, but I have not checked the full list. |
Go for
AFAICT this refers to the config files itself and not the documentation, so there is nothing for us to do here.
Just write a short paragraph mentioning this and we will comment on it in your PR.
Add linebreaks and go for
IMO this can be ignored. If someone finds a wrong usage of this term he should report it here or fix it. Because otherwise we need a grammar master to identify them all. We should pay attention to that in new PRs though. |
in short, when there are conflicting commands in Sponge, that conflict with the games native commands, we also have the command's primary alias, with a prefix of the mod/game/plugin. So if someone registers a /tp command in a plugin, that is say, incompatible with your camera mod, if you can configure your camera mod to use /minecraft:tp instead, you will get the expected behavior again. The same goes with conflicting commands from multiple plugins. e.g. you could have /nucleus:tp and /easywarps:tp It's a common question that appears on the forums occasionally. |
I have the changes ready. I just need to sort out some issues with git / github. I am still getting git's workflow down. |
Once @Grauldon 's changes are included, I will update most code examples. |
AFAICT we have now solved all issues listed here, so I guess we can close this issue (and create a new one for future comments). Objections? |
we could also delete all comments that are no longer relevant, similar to other minor issue lists in the org |
I would rather close this issue and keep the comments, and just make a Fresh issue. Should we continue calling it the 'OCD' List (which does have unwanted connotations), or something a little more sanitised? |
I'd say drop the parentheses, and just call it "Ongoing Minor Issue List SpongeDocs Edition" and make a new issue |
Closing this to make way for the new-born #698 |
I'd like to start an OCD post on the Docs repo, this way we don't push minor fixes but instead collect them and push them in bunches.
@SupaHam reported these two in '#sponge:
/plugin/debugging
phrasing in L91:/plugin/event/causes
:Optionml<Entity>
in L45according to PR#447:
plugin/optional/usage.rst
(L166):if (optinalString.isPresent())
I'll quote @phroa here:
@Dannyps reported:
server/getting-started/configuration/index
:Saving a world config may be desired *after making modifications to the file*.
is confusing. It should read:Saving a world config to the file may be desired after making modifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: