Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What's in a name? #3

Open
Tarkisflux opened this issue Sep 13, 2013 · 15 comments
Open

What's in a name? #3

Tarkisflux opened this issue Sep 13, 2013 · 15 comments
Labels

Comments

@Tarkisflux
Copy link
Collaborator

Book needs a name. Hardest part of anything really. Feel free to just drop ideas in here, whether they be good, bad, or other.

This will likely be open for a long, long time.

@ExplosiveRunes
Copy link
Collaborator

Well, I didn't choose "awesomeTome" and I think that it originally was just a goofy name for the database. The PDF itself currently gives a title of "The Tomes".

When we get a system-complete PDF, I could easily see trying to name it something with the classic D&D alliteration. Something along the lines of "Tomes & Texts: Inspired by the Works of Frank and K".

@Lokathor
Copy link
Collaborator

Putting Frank and K on the cover is fine, but I'd leave author names out of the title. We might be able to come up with a good "___ and ___" title if we think on it a bit. Though Tome starts with "T", "Tunnels and Trolls" is already taken. We should also avoid something that abbreviates to DnD, to avoid confusion. Other than that there's a lot of options.

@SqueeG
Copy link
Owner

SqueeG commented Sep 14, 2013

BtM
Better than Mearls :p

@Lokathor
Copy link
Collaborator

We could just have a blank PDF and meet that standard...

@Tarkisflux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Let's put one of those blank dpfs then, accomplish something early on ;-)

On names, I plan on just dropping things here as they strike me, because maybe something will be good or thought provoking or whatever.

  • "Infants and Immortals"
  • "Logistics and Legends"

@saulrh
Copy link

saulrh commented Sep 15, 2013

There are actually two names we need here.

First, we need the name that goes on the cover. For that, I think that we want to stick with something like "The Tomes", maybe with a subheading like "Updated Rules for DnD 3.x". Every time I've met someone that knew about these rules, they were recognized under the name "tome rules".

Second, we need a name to disambiguate this effort from the awesomeTome and any past or future pdfs. For that, I'll actually suggest that we track down how many Tome PDFs there have been and then have version names drawn from classic DND monsters: first revision is "Aboleth", then "Balor", and so on. I figure that this pdf is somewhere around "Dragon" or "Efreeti".

@SqueeG
Copy link
Owner

SqueeG commented Sep 15, 2013

d20 : 3 point Tome /3.Tome/3pT

The Tomes : Rules for your favorite Fantasy Kitchen Sink.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 16, 2013

"Tome Heartbreaker Extraordinaire: Designed Extra New". See what I did there? :P

@SqueeG
Copy link
Owner

SqueeG commented Sep 16, 2013

Heyoooooo!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 16, 2013

Hi to you too SqueeG.

@SqueeG
Copy link
Owner

SqueeG commented Sep 16, 2013

Haha, sorry it was an Ed Mcmahon reference.

Glad to see you on-board Sinister.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 16, 2013

Hardly 'on-board'. I'll probably chime in occasionally - being a grad student is pretty hard work. I figured since I couldn't sleep anyway, I'd contribute something.

@Tarkisflux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm planning on referring to this as the TRD (Tome Reference Document) until we have a more catchy name. But as it's a minor increment from SRD, I'm reasonably happy with it in the interim.

@SqueeG
Copy link
Owner

SqueeG commented Sep 28, 2013

Yea I was using TSRD. I like TRD more, though.

@Lokathor
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah, TRD is a solid name, even to keep long term if we want.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants