Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

correct bcrypt to fix the known issue with 4.1.2 #6210

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sravs-dev
Copy link
Contributor

I was testing st23.9 dev on Rhel9, st2auth fails to startup with following error. Downgrading bcrypt to fix the known bug in 4.1.2
Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 6 53 24 PM

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS PR that changes 0-9 lines. Quick fix/merge. label May 31, 2024
@amanda11
Copy link
Contributor

amanda11 commented Jun 1, 2024

The fixed requirements file is input to the other requirements files, so you need to regenerate the top level and component requirements files.
Please see comment on top-level requirements file.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/S PR that changes 10-29 lines. Very easy to review. and removed size/XS PR that changes 0-9 lines. Quick fix/merge. labels Jun 1, 2024
@nzlosh
Copy link
Contributor

nzlosh commented Jun 10, 2024

Can you add a changelog entry for the PR please?

@sravs-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nzlosh I have updated the changelog. Could you pls take a look. Thank you!

@nzlosh nzlosh enabled auto-merge (squash) June 10, 2024 16:53
@sravs-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

sravs-dev commented Jun 11, 2024

@nzlosh One of the CI test failed, looking at logs , it doesn't seem to be related to this change. I noticed that st2api and st2auth failed to start as the ports are not available . Here is the log from the test run

st2api.log
[2024-06-10 16:45:57 +0000] [7639] [INFO] Starting gunicorn 22.0.0
[2024-06-10 16:45:57 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9101)
[2024-06-10 16:45:57 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:45:58 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9101)
[2024-06-10 16:45:58 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:45:59 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9101)
[2024-06-10 16:45:59 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:00 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9101)
[2024-06-10 16:46:00 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:01 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9101)
[2024-06-10 16:46:01 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:02 +0000] [7639] [ERROR] Can't connect to ('0.0.0.0', 9101)

st2auth
[2024-06-10 16:46:09 +0000] [7787] [INFO] Starting gunicorn 22.0.0
[2024-06-10 16:46:09 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9100)
[2024-06-10 16:46:09 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:10 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9100)
[2024-06-10 16:46:10 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:11 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9100)
[2024-06-10 16:46:11 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:12 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9100)
[2024-06-10 16:46:12 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:13 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Connection in use: ('0.0.0.0', 9100)
[2024-06-10 16:46:13 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Retrying in 1 second.
[2024-06-10 16:46:14 +0000] [7787] [ERROR] Can't connect to ('0.0.0.0', 9100)

Same CI check passed for the previous commit , before change log was added . Here is the older CI test result for Orquesta on py3.8 https://github.com/StackStorm/st2/actions/runs/9330762609/job/25684689576

Can someone retrigger the CI checks? Looks to be a transient issue.

@cognifloyd cognifloyd disabled auto-merge June 11, 2024 14:11
@cognifloyd
Copy link
Member

Looks good. I'm going to update the pantsbuild dependencies (the lockfile) here and then I'll merge.

Copy link
Member

@cognifloyd cognifloyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blocking until I update the pants lockfile.

@cognifloyd
Copy link
Member

cognifloyd commented Jun 11, 2024

OK. Looking further into this:
none of the code in this repo has a direct dependency on passlib or bcyrpt.
The passlib dep comes from st2-auth-backend-flat-file: https://github.com/StackStorm/st2-auth-backend-flat-file/blob/master/requirements.txt

passlib>=1.7.1,<1.8.0

So, I think the passlib[bcrypt] extra should go in that file, not in this repo. WIP branch: https://github.com/StackStorm/st2-auth-backend-flat-file/compare/bcrypt-reqs-fix

I'm researching the issue with passlib+bcrypt.

The issue was introduced in bcrypt 4.1.0, which was yanked because of it. This PR moved some attributes around, and added a bcrypt._bcrypt.__version__ attribute, which made passlib assume it was py-bcrypt instead of bcrypt:

Supposedly, the issue was resolved in bcrypt 4.1.1 by renaming bcrypt._bcrypt.__version__ to bcrypt._bcrypt.__version_ex__:

But, the error you posted is still present in at least bcrypt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2. That error occurs because bcrypt 4.1.0+ removed bcrypt.__about__, putting the vars under bcrypt._bcrypt and directly under bcrypt instead. That message comes from:

It should just be a logged warning message though, and the version var is only used for a debug log message. So, that error message should be a red herring.

@sravs-dev are there any other logged error messages?

@cognifloyd
Copy link
Member

Here's the upstream passlib issue: https://foss.heptapod.net/python-libs/passlib/-/issues/190
Sounds like 1.7.5 will drop support for py-bcrypt and bcryptor to remove the bcrypt lib detection mess.

I'm still not sure why st2auth would fail when using bcrypt 4.1.* however since that warning is not fatal.

@cognifloyd
Copy link
Member

Here's an upstream bcrypt issue about the passlib warning message: pyca/bcrypt#684
They also point out that this is a warning, and passlib+bcrypt should still function without issue.

So, we need to find a different root cause for the reported "st2auth fails to startup" issue, and why downgrading bcrypt would ameliorate that.

@sravs-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cognifloyd Thank you so much for digging into this. I couldn't find any other error message in st2auth logs. Let me rerun st2 on rhel9 and double check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S PR that changes 10-29 lines. Very easy to review. status:need more info
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants