Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

extra_width option for match_selection and match_brackets #453

Closed
markusgritsch opened this issue Sep 2, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

extra_width option for match_selection and match_brackets #453

markusgritsch opened this issue Sep 2, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@markusgritsch
Copy link

Currently the line surrounding other occurrences of the currently selected text and the underline indicating matching brackets is just 1 pixel thick, and not easily spotted.

Like there is a caret_extra_width option, it would be nice if there would be similar settings to increase the with of those thin lines.

@markusgritsch
Copy link
Author

Build 3158 added a color scheme option for selection border width, which also controls the width of other occurences of the currently selected text.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 5, 2018

Does it include the width of match_brackets? If so, this is a fixed issue...

@FichteFoll FichteFoll added this to the Build 3158 milestone Apr 8, 2018
@markusgritsch
Copy link
Author

Well, since the width of bracket underlines is not affected by this, I would not have set this bug to fixed. But since I don't use bracket underlining anymore I don't care.

@FichteFoll
Copy link
Collaborator

FichteFoll commented May 2, 2018

Oh, sorry, I misread and didn't verify myself either. Do you retract your request then or should I reopen? I mean, this is a reasonable request but not if nobody is using it.

@markusgritsch
Copy link
Author

As already mentioned, I'm fine with it.

@FichteFoll FichteFoll removed this from the Build 3158 milestone May 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants