Can't install "git" package #1296

Stanzilla · 2014-10-30T05:47:37Z

The error message is not quite clear, it just says "git could not be downloaded"

Diaoul · 2014-10-30T17:16:37Z

Do you still experience the issue?

aniceberg · 2014-10-30T17:35:15Z

I can't install any packages- I get "download failed". Is the repo down?

http://packages.synocommunity.com/

Stanzilla · 2014-10-30T17:53:06Z

@Diaoul yes

aniceberg · 2014-10-30T19:24:46Z

Is there any place else I can download the SPKs so that I can do a manual install?

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T07:54:35Z

What architecture are you using?

RedNasSyno · 2014-10-31T10:52:21Z

Same problems from my side. I have the same problems with downloading the Git, Python, NZBGet packages from SynoCommunity. /var/log/messages reports: PkgSynoMan.cgi: pkgserver.cpp:668 Failed to verify the package

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T11:40:16Z

What model are you using? Which version of DSM? Please give more information.

shakerben · 2014-10-31T11:49:45Z

I'm having the same issues on a DS415play running 5.1 -4977

Potentially just a beta issue though.

RedNasSyno · 2014-10-31T11:51:02Z

I'm using a Synology DS214 with DSM5.1. It worked till 2 days ago.
Maybe this has something to do with it:

But that was 2 days ago.

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T12:07:14Z

Yeah that's my tweet, everything should be ok now.

For DSM 5.1 there is a new "feature" that requires the packages to be signed. I have not implemented this yet so you won't be able to install SynoCommunity's packages with the default DSM settings. You can change the settings in the Package Center setting page I believe.

shakerben · 2014-10-31T13:08:12Z

I have actually tried that already and had no more luck.

I've been able to install packages from various sources and also manually, just not from the synocommunity source.

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T13:39:21Z

Maybe that's an issue with the checksum hence the message. Either this is a beta issue or this is an architecture specific issue.

Does the message appear after the actual download? There are two places where there is a checksum, the catalog and the package itself.

I'm away for the weekend so fixes on the repo will come on Sunday evening.

RedNasSyno · 2014-10-31T13:39:33Z

The same for me. I'm able to install for at least from 3 different sources, but not anymore from synocommunity. The 'signed' package feature doesn't change anything.

RedNasSyno · 2014-10-31T13:45:13Z

The message appears after the download. So first it says downloading (see the attached picture, sorry for the Dutch) and after downloading it says could not download.

Stanzilla · 2014-10-31T14:05:24Z

I am using 5.1 beta but I disabled the signature feature, it's a DS212 MARVELL Kirkwood

aniceberg · 2014-10-31T14:18:32Z

I am also using the 5.1 beta on a DS411 (88f6282), signature check off.

In the meanwhile, can somebody post the repo download links so that we can manually download and install packages?

shakerben · 2014-10-31T16:40:25Z

I installed some packages from here - http://synology.w01.eu

Found that in another thread.

When I installed them it said updates were available but trying to update would fail too.

I'd love a link to manually download for the time being.

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T17:08:19Z

If it doesn't work for DSM 5.1 users I think it's an issue with the beta, ask Synology for support. There are few new features with the repo that might involve checksum verification.

Meanwhile, @piwi82 can you simulate a catalog request and a download in DSM 5.1 with a md5 checksum validation of the package.tgz?

shakerben · 2014-10-31T18:49:32Z

Thanks Antoine - I'll do a bit more digging and see if I can figure it out.

It only seems to impact this repo though, all others I've tried work ok.

I suppose you have to expect this sort of issue with a beta.

On 31 Oct 2014, at 17:08, Antoine Bertin notifications@github.com wrote:

If it doesn't work for DSM 5.1 users I think it's an issue with the beta, ask Synology for support. There are few new features with the repo that might involve checksum verification.

Meanwhile, @piwi82 can you simulate a catalog request and a download in DSM 5.1 with a md5 checksum validation of the package.tgz?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T18:58:48Z

Others repos may have not implemented the checksum verification. It really depends on the implementation.

Soon I'll publicly release the source code of the repository. In the last weeks I have achieved 100% unittests coverage and that's a big step.

piwi82 · 2014-10-31T19:30:32Z

@Diaoul : Is checksum validation compared with the md5 stored in INFO file ?

I still use DSM 5.0, so I won't be able to identify what breaks downloads.

There is no big difference between requests in DSM 5.0 and 5.1 except GET/POST method on catalog requests. Here is an example from today logs :

DSM 5.1 catalog request :

user-agent: "synology_88f6282_413j DSM5.1-4977 (package)"
http-request: "GET /?package_update_channel=beta&unique=synology_88f6282_413j&build=4977&language=enu&major=5&arch=88f6282&minor=1&timezone=Eastern&ds_sn=######## HTTP/1.1"

DSM 5.0 catalog request :

user-agent: "synology_88f6282_413j DSM5.0-4528 (package)"
http-request: "POST / HTTP/1.1"
data: "package_update_channel=stable&unique=synology_88f6282_413j&build=4528&language=enu&major=5&arch=88f6282&minor=0&timezone=Brussels&ds_sn=########"

DSM 5.1 download request :

user-agent:"synology_88f6282_413j DSM5.1-4977 (package)"
http-request: "GET /squidguard/1/squidguard_1_88f628x_1594.spk HTTP/1.1"

DSM 5.0 download request :

user-agent:  "synology_88f6282_413j DSM5.0-4528 (package)"
http-request: "GET /btsync/8/btsync_8_88f628x_1594.spk HTTP/1.1"

Diaoul · 2014-10-31T20:31:51Z

The md5 of the catalog should be compared with the md5sum of the package.tgz in the SPK. It should also be the same that the one in the INFO.

kickserves · 2014-10-31T21:23:58Z

Have the same issue. On dsm 5.1 on 1812+ and it looks like it is downloading and then says download failed. Same for updates too. And the same occurs for any synocommunity package.

shakerben · 2014-10-31T21:40:20Z

Thanks for all the hard work Antoine.

Really appreciate it and the quick support with these issues. Look forward to hearing more developments soon.

On 31 Oct 2014, at 18:58, Antoine Bertin notifications@github.com wrote:

Others repos may have not implemented the checksum verification. It really depends on the implementation.

Soon I'll publicly release the source code of the repository. In the last weeks I have achieved 100% unittests coverage and that's a big step.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

andreground · 2014-11-01T11:51:48Z

Same here #1298

kickserves · 2014-11-01T17:49:07Z

This are the entries from /var/log/messages when attempting to download packages from synocommunity. None of them work on DSM 5.1 regardless of whatever settings changes you make on the server.

Oct 31 10:00:54 xxxx PkgSynoMan.cgi: pkgserver.cpp:668 Failed to verify the package /volume1/@tmp/@synopkg/@download/git/@SYNOPKG_DOWNLOAD_git by MD5 bb3deed6c5846c13c10ed16fe48bce0d

Oct 31 13:50:57 xxxx PkgSynoMan.cgi: pkgserver.cpp:668 Failed to verify the package /volume1/@tmp/@synopkg/@download/nzbget-testing/@SYNOPKG_DOWNLOAD_nzbget-testing by MD5 a660840b8fabae4c9cfe5a1d2f4edd19

Oct 31 13:51:08 xxxx PkgSynoMan.cgi: pkgserver.cpp:668 Failed to verify the package /volume1/@tmp/@synopkg/@download/nzbget/@SYNOPKG_DOWNLOAD_nzbget by MD5 5027b29878e382166cd66cb4d44db77c

hansolor · 2014-11-02T00:43:52Z

same here i'am on a hold whit 5.1

andreground · 2014-11-02T10:58:28Z

That's what happens on my ds212j when trying to install a package:

Nov 2 11:57:32 DiskStation PkgSynoMan.cgi: pkgserver.cpp:668 Failed to verify the package /volume1/@tmp/@synopkg/@download/btsync/@SYNOPKG_DOWNLOAD_btsync by MD5 d880cd926fe2808a18b8e0817d11d6a8

Signature validation is OFF

Diaoul · 2014-11-02T20:41:42Z

I have identified the issue. It's because the md5 sent by the catalog is the md5sum of the package.tgz inside the SPK but it should be the md5sum of the whole SPK. Hence the failed verification.

I'll fix this ASAP.

shakerben · 2014-11-02T20:45:36Z

Thanks Antoine. Look forward to the fix!

On 2 Nov 2014, at 20:41, Antoine Bertin notifications@github.com wrote:

I have identified the issue. It's because the md5 sent by the catalog is the md5sum of the package.tgz inside the SPK but it should be the md5sum of the whole SPK. Hence the failed verification.

I'll fix this ASAP.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

andreground · 2014-11-02T20:53:12Z

Super top! Thanks!

Il domenica 2 novembre 2014, Antoine Bertin notifications@github.com ha
scritto:

I have identified the issue. It's because the md5 sent by the catalog is
the md5sum of the package.tgz inside the SPK but it should be the md5sum of
the whole SPK. Hence the failed verification.

I'll fix this ASAP.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1296 (comment)
.

Diaoul · 2014-11-03T23:23:16Z

Can you confirm this is fixed?

hansolor · 2014-11-03T23:26:41Z

Thanks you it is working again

shakerben · 2014-11-03T23:28:02Z

Yep works for me now too.

Thank you!

kickserves · 2014-11-04T00:06:42Z

Works now. Thank you.

RedNasSyno · 2014-11-04T09:28:35Z

Thanks Antoine for the good work! It's working again.

Diaoul closed this as completed Oct 30, 2014

Diaoul reopened this Oct 30, 2014

piwi82 mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2014

Can't download any package from repo on DS212j #1298

Closed

Diaoul mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2014

Failed to download "git", "python", and "python3" #1304

Closed

Diaoul closed this as completed Nov 3, 2014

Can't install "git" package #1296

Can't install "git" package #1296

Comments

Stanzilla commented Oct 30, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 30, 2014

aniceberg commented Oct 30, 2014

Stanzilla commented Oct 30, 2014

aniceberg commented Oct 30, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

RedNasSyno commented Oct 31, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

shakerben commented Oct 31, 2014

RedNasSyno commented Oct 31, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

shakerben commented Oct 31, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

RedNasSyno commented Oct 31, 2014

RedNasSyno commented Oct 31, 2014

Stanzilla commented Oct 31, 2014

aniceberg commented Oct 31, 2014

shakerben commented Oct 31, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

shakerben commented Oct 31, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

piwi82 commented Oct 31, 2014

Diaoul commented Oct 31, 2014

kickserves commented Oct 31, 2014

shakerben commented Oct 31, 2014

andreground commented Nov 1, 2014

kickserves commented Nov 1, 2014

hansolor commented Nov 2, 2014

andreground commented Nov 2, 2014

Diaoul commented Nov 2, 2014

shakerben commented Nov 2, 2014

andreground commented Nov 2, 2014

Diaoul commented Nov 3, 2014

hansolor commented Nov 3, 2014

shakerben commented Nov 3, 2014

kickserves commented Nov 4, 2014

RedNasSyno commented Nov 4, 2014