Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ambiguity in CPU Affinity: #16

Closed
typedef-int-value opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Ambiguity in CPU Affinity: #16

typedef-int-value opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@typedef-int-value
Copy link

typedef-int-value commented Feb 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The description of the scope of CPU Affinity is ambiguous.
If there are 8 cores, it would be better to indicate the range as 0-7.
A typical user might understand it as 1-8.

image
@SystemXFiles SystemXFiles added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 6, 2024
@SystemXFiles
Copy link
Owner

@typedef-int-value Hello!
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. There is indeed some ambiguity and I will fix this in the next release.

SystemXFiles added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
@SystemXFiles
[#16] Fix ambiguity in CPU Affinity
e51341b
SystemXFiles added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
@SystemXFiles
[#16] Update screenshot
f6dbc66
@SystemXFiles
Copy link
Owner

Fixed in release https://github.com/SystemXFiles/process-governor/releases/tag/v1.2.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SystemXFiles @typedef-int-value