-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
<derivation> should allow <bibl> in its content model #1830
Comments
The spec for derivation says that info about the sources from which a text is derived should be supplied in the sourceDesc. Which makes more sense to me |
<derivation>
should allow <bibl>
in its content model
Council F2F with @martindholmes agree that the bibliography for a translation or other type of derivation information belongs in |
Pull request issued. |
This is now just waiting on pull request #1924. |
Happy to merge unless requested reviewers would like to have a say @jamescummings @emylonas @martinascholger |
Fixed example added for issue #1830. Merge confirmed at Council meeting.
This has been merged, so I'm closing this. |
Fixed example added for issue #1830. Merge confirmed at Council meeting.
<derivation>
can be used to specify that a text is a translation from another text:<derivation type="translation">
but there's no easy way to specify what it's a translation of. I think the content model of
<derivation>
should allow<bibl>
so that information about the original text can be supplied.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: