-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inconsistent spelling of header #1969
Comments
Here ist the style guide: http://teic.github.io/TCW/tcw24.html |
Excellent, thanks! |
fixed in TCW20: TEIC/Documentation@c3511ed |
Mostly fixed in 55e9569. German speakers: I did not know what to do with
in model.teiHeaderPart. |
In German it is "TEI-Header" |
So the German description of model.teiHeaderPart should read “umfasst Elemente, die innerhalb von TEI-Header benutzt werden dürfen und mehrmals auftreten können.” then, eh? I will check that in now. Please let me know (or fix directly) if I have that wrong. |
innerhalb |
@sydb I'll change this now |
Unless there is an objection from another German speaker (@martinascholger, @peterstadler, @ martinmueller39, and @smjwsk jump to mind) I will plan to delete “von” in a few hours. |
"innerhalb des TEI-Headers" |
closing with 2c2d3ac |
Danke! |
As a native speaker of German, I agree that genitive is “des Headers”. This is what Duden says, too. Interestingly, Duden also says that the plural of the Germanized word “Header” is “die Headers”. I don’t think this English-style plural is how the German speakers who regularly use “Header” would form the plural. It ought to be “die Header”, as in “der Koffer, des Koffers, die Koffer“. This is an indication that Header has truly been adopted as a German word, at least in the IT community. Virtually no one outside IT uses “Header” in German. I just noticed that Duden also claims that Header may be either male oder neuter. It’s male in my view. I launched a Twitter poll on that. |
@martinascholger says we are inconsistent in our use of “TEI Header” vs “TEI header”. A little bit of research says she’s right. Looking at 1b6e0b1, I find
in the content. (I.e., looking only at text() nodes.) If we remove the apostrophes and esses, that reduces to:
Document TCW 20 does not mention how to spell this. But it does refer the reader to the Style Guide, but that link is dead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: