Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Room type presets #75

Closed
2 tasks done
SamuelWei opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1059
Closed
2 tasks done

Room type presets #75

SamuelWei opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1059

Comments

@SamuelWei
Copy link
Collaborator

SamuelWei commented Nov 9, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In #62 the basis room attributes are introduced. In addition to the already existing attributes each RoomType should have some more attributes that effect the room settings for all rooms with this type.

Describe the solution you'd like
A RoomTypeSettings Model should be created.
For each RoomType the RoomTypeSettings should be editable.
Each RoomTypeSetting (predefined list via seeder) can be set, accordingly to its content type and enforced.
Enforced means that the user cannot change the setting in the room settings. If the RoomType is changed, apply the enforced settings: overwrite and lock.
E.g. RoomType "Private Meeting" -> enforce 'allow guests' disabled and require access code.
If a setting is not enforced the settings are applied once on creation of new meetings with this type.

Describe alternatives you've considered

--

Additional context
Future ideas

  • Add server clusters for each room type and enforce selection (solved in Add server pooling #99)
  • Grant access to room types for some groups, e.g. Students can only create 'small group' meetings, limited in the duration, max. participants and server pool (see Restrict room type access #98)
@dsst95
Copy link
Contributor

dsst95 commented Mar 4, 2021

My proposal:
Untitled Diagram-Page-1
Untitled Diagram-Page-2

@dsst95
Copy link
Contributor

dsst95 commented Mar 4, 2021

For this and for ticket #98

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants