Fix for #680 ported to 2.9.4 #697
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merge pull request TIBCOSoftware#684 from TIBCOSoftware/2.9.4
|
@richardyam-tibco this already has been opened months ago, could you please consider to merge it for 2.9.5? Thanks! |
|
hello? anyone? |
|
hello again? |
1 similar comment
|
hello again? |
richardyam-tibco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
****What's this Pull request about?
This is the fix for the issue #680 already opened for 2.9.2 but as this wasn't merged. Open it again aligned with last master code for 2.9.4
****Which Issue(s) this Pull Request will fix?
#680
****Does this pull request maintain backward compatibility?
Yes
****How this pull request has been tested?
This has been tested with the dependency inject-1.jar that is a valid JAR from JPA and Hibernate that doesn't contain a MANIFEST.MF and that doesn't make it "wrong" when used as a JAR dependency and not an OSGI dependency.
****Screenshots (if appropriate)
N/A
****Any background context or comments you want to provide?
N/A