Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Iterative solvers via lis #145

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023
Merged

Iterative solvers via lis #145

merged 13 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023

Conversation

TLCFEM
Copy link
Owner

@TLCFEM TLCFEM commented Jun 16, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #145 (9c3444f) into dev (d498211) will increase coverage by 0.0001%.
The diff coverage is 87.1795%.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##                dev       #145        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   89.9132%   89.9133%   +0.0002%     
================================================
  Files           631        632         +1     
  Lines         27987      28017        +30     
  Branches       3259       3260         +1     
================================================
+ Hits          25164      25191        +27     
- Misses         2823       2826         +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Solver/Integrator/LeeNewmarkBase.cpp 78.9474% <ø> (ø)
Step/Step.h 100.0000% <ø> (ø)
UnitTest/TestMatrix.cpp 96.1390% <ø> (-0.8191%) ⬇️
suanPan.cpp 100.0000% <ø> (+25.0000%) ⬆️
Domain/MetaMat/SparseMatLis.hpp 86.4865% <86.4865%> (ø)
Domain/Factory.hpp 96.9982% <100.0000%> (+0.0057%) ⬆️
Step/Step.cpp 71.7949% <100.0000%> (+0.3664%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@TLCFEM TLCFEM merged commit 4dc1482 into dev Jun 16, 2023
11 of 12 checks passed
@TLCFEM TLCFEM deleted the feature-lis-lib branch June 16, 2023 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant