feat(pages): new architecture page #9
Conversation
wdavidw
force-pushed
the
feat/david-page-architecture
branch
from
7d78da7
to
98be99a
Compare
|
@wdavidw Thank you for this redesign and new implementation of the website, much appreciated ! As noted by @rpignolet, i think that extra components (and especially airflow) should not be part of the reference architecture. Also, I don't see our proposal (the old French content) about architecture, features, etc. What do you think ? Thank you again ! |
|
@rpignolet wrote "Airflow is not a core component currently, we should not have it here.", he didn't mention removing it. My personal take is that extra shall be covered. I have never been in agreement with the notion of core or extra, the segregation is counter-productive. Instead, what we have are different levels of maturity, some levels not being supported because too immature, and eventually a playground. In the example of Airflow, the component is too essential to be considered optional or part of a playground. For the old French content, I would not recommend starting from there. I tried to preserve some of it on the home page and would likely rewrite it if I have time. |
|
To complement, the component list is not exhaustive, additional services shall enrich the page, including what is in tdp-collection-prerequisites and tdp-collection-extras. |
|
@wdavidw thank you again ! i suggest discussing this point during our next meeting .. |
No description provided.