-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not transpile async functions #353
Comments
I literally just ran into this same issue when compiling a Gatsby site after adding react-form: 555 | _asyncToGenerator(
556 | /*#__PURE__*/
> 557 | regeneratorRuntime.mark(function _callee() {
| ^
558 | var e,
559 | needsResubmit,
560 | fieldValidationPromises,
WebpackError: ReferenceError: regeneratorRuntime is not defined
- index.es.js:557 useForm
node_modules/react-form/dist/index.es.js:557:1 Love the library, but this sneaky third party dep is causing some pain. |
nikku
added a commit
to nikku/react-form
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2019
Yeah, let's do it. One of you wanna submit a PR for that? |
nikku
added a commit
to nikku/react-form
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2019
tannerlinsley
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thanks for providing
react-form@4
❤️.I'm working with front-end requirements that would allow me to use async functions out of the box. Unfortunately I still need to bundle the regenerator runtime in order to use
react-form@4.0.0...
.This leads me to the question if you could drop transpilation of async functions.
At this point, all browsers except for IE 11 (dead) support async functions, cf. caniuse.
Using
babel@7
people that still need to support IE 11 or other (older) browsers could transpileasync
via overrides.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: