Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the slice and splice slot specific #384

Closed
tyler489 opened this issue Jul 29, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #461
Closed

Make the slice and splice slot specific #384

tyler489 opened this issue Jul 29, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #461
Labels
Area-Parity 1.12.2 missing features MC-1.20.1 P-2-Low Low priority. Not hurting anyone, just annoying. Type-Enhancement New feature or enhancement to existing feature.

Comments

@tyler489
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the solution you'd like
in 1.12 shift clicking mats into the soul binder would make the mats go into the slots they were supposed to, and only put in the number of mats needed, if you clicked a stack of redstone, only one would go in, not 6 and it would go into the bottom middle slot.

@tyler489 tyler489 added Type-Enhancement New feature or enhancement to existing feature. MC-1.20.1 Area-Parity 1.12.2 missing features P-2-Low Low priority. Not hurting anyone, just annoying. labels Jul 29, 2023
@ferriarnus
Copy link
Member

This would mean we would need to have a per-slot recipe look up, which I doubt we will do, unless there's another way.

@justliliandev
Copy link
Contributor

there is one actually, pre computing allowed items on resource reload

@Rover656
Copy link
Member

Rover656 commented Aug 4, 2023

Have I introduced our friend, RecipeInputCache :P on a more serious note, we could adapt it to care about the order of ingredients :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Parity 1.12.2 missing features MC-1.20.1 P-2-Low Low priority. Not hurting anyone, just annoying. Type-Enhancement New feature or enhancement to existing feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants